| 查看: 985 | 回复: 12 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
wxw1981_2001木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
帮忙分析一下
|
||
|
投的一个英国杂志刚有回复：Major revisions 我这是第一次投英文文章，感觉是大修。然后告诉老板，老板说别人的都不这样，怎么到你这就大修了呢，我晕了，然后还问：修了之后还有枪毙的可能吗？我再次晕！ 大家帮我分析一下，我是修改呢还是改投？ 编辑的原话: Thank you for submitting this manuscript for consideration for publication in Food and Bioproducts Processing. We have now received referees' reports. Major revisions are required before the manuscript can be accepted for publication. I would be pleased to receive a revised version from you for further consideration. When submitting your revised manuscript, please respond to the comments made by the referees. In general, the language needs to be improved and it is strongly recommended that the manuscript be proofread by an English editor. In order to expedite the processing of the revised manuscript, please be as specific as possible in your response to the referees. We aim to facilitate timely publication of all manuscripts submitted to Food and Bioproducts Processing, so please submit your revised manuscript as soon as possible, and within four months at latest. If you require additional time to revise the manuscript, please e-mail the Editorial Office: sord@icheme.org 其中一个评阅人的话： General comments This manuscript will add to the knowledge of films based on carrot puree once a major revision was made. The academic and industrial interest of the subject is relevant and technical quality is acceptable regarding the preformed assays. However the presentation and the readability of the paper should be revised and improved. A physicochemical characterization of the carrot puree used in film formulations is required as well as a description about film appearance. Likewise, authors should consider to perform color analysis of developed films since this is a critical parameter that determine future film applications. In my opinion, the experiments performed have been carefully planned but the manuscript has been wrongly organized. Materials and Methods section has not been described in a proper form. Film formulation, which is the core of the paper, is not clear and according to this, readers would be disconcerted about the Results and Discussion section. Besides, as a reader, I expect a deep discussion of the obtained results. The literature cited is relevant and adequate. The statistical analysis performed was inobjectable and it was described in the main text and tables. Although, an explanation or hypothesis about statistical observations are required in order to improve the discussion of the obtained results. 后面是具体的修改意见。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有17人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有15人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有5人回复
-
跳槽后在研项目怎么办？
已经有10人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有10人回复
-
今天放榜吗？
已经有16人回复
-
93BebMhtakh前后11位开头都是大写
已经有8人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有4人回复
-
只有每年这种时候来逛逛小木虫
已经有26人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有16人回复
10楼2010-01-05 14:52:00
tianhu2003
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 9406.1
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 1637
- 在线: 249小时
- 虫号: 601647
- 注册: 2008-09-13
- 专业: 半导体电子器件
4楼2010-01-05 14:11:34
butterfly1234
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1612.2
- 帖子: 591
- 在线: 485.6小时
- 虫号: 465390
- 注册: 2007-11-22
- 专业: 无机非金属类光电信息与功
5楼2010-01-05 14:13:54
dioxane
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 4 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2172.5
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 1018
- 在线: 102.2小时
- 虫号: 928477
- 注册: 2009-12-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属有机化学
7楼2010-01-05 14:20:17
