| ²é¿´: 355 | »Ø¸´: 4 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
tiefengfangͳæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÇóÖúÒ»¸öÒâ˼µÄ±í´ï[½ØÖ¹ÈÕÆÚ2010Äê1ÔÂ20ÈÕ]
|
||
|
´ó¼ÒºÃ£¬Ð¡µÜÓÐÒ»ÊÂÏëÈôó¼Ò°ï棬ÏÈллÁË¡£ ÎÒÃÇÓÐÆªÎÄÕ£¬ÆäÖÐÒ»¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û²»Ì«ºÃ£¬µ«ÊÇÎÒÃÇ¿´ÁËÖ®ºó¾õµÃÊÇËûÎó½âÎÒÃǵÄÎÄÕÂÁË¡£µ±È»´ð¸´Éó¸åÈ˵ÄʱºòÎÒÃDz»ÄÜÖ±½Ó˵ËûµÄÒâ¼ûÊÇ´íµÄ¡£ÎÒÃÇÏëÔڻظ´µÄʱºò±í´ïÏÂÃæÕâÖÖÒâ˼£º ÓÉÓÚÎÒÃǵÄÎÄÕÂÔÚÏà¹ØµØ·½Ã»ÓÐдÇå³þ£¬±í´ïµÃ²»Ì«Ã÷ÀÊ£¬ÒÔÖÂÉó¸åÈ˶ÔÎÒÃǵŤ×÷ÓÐÎó½â¡£ÏÖÔÚÎÒÐÞ¸ÄÁËÎÄÕ£¬Ï£Íû¿ÉÒÔÏû³ýÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÎó½â¡£ СµÜÎÒµÄÓ¢Óïˮƽ²»Ì«ºÃ£¬Ö»ÄÜÉúÓ²µØ°ÑÉÏÃæÕâ¶Î»°·Òë³ÉÓ¢ÎÄ£¬µ«ÊÇÎÒÃÇÏ뾡Á¿ËµµÃ¿ÍÆø¡¢Î¯Íñµã£¬ÈÃÉó¸åÈËÓкõÄÓ¡Ïñ¡£ Çë¸ßÊÖ³öÀ´°ï°ïÎÒ°É£¬Èç¹ûÓÐÂúÒâµÄ»ØÌù£¬ÎÒ·îÉÏ10¸ö½ð±ÒÏàËÍ£¬ÒÔ±íлÒâ¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
297Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
288Çóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¹þ¹¤´ó ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
085600£¬320·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ27È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ö£ÖÝ´óѧ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶£¬Ó¢¶þÊý¶þ342·Ö£¬ÇóÀÏʦÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
292Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
270»¯¹¤Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ295
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
266Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
¡ï ¡ï
linghanyuan(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷ 12-29 20:55
linghanyuan(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷ 12-29 20:55
|
ÓÉÓÚÎÒÃǵÄÎÄÕÂÔÚÏà¹ØµØ·½Ã»ÓÐдÇå³þ£¬±í´ïµÃ²»Ì«Ã÷ÀÊ£¬ÒÔÖÂÉó¸åÈ˶ÔÎÒÃǵŤ×÷ÓÐÎó½â¡£ÏÖÔÚÎÒÐÞ¸ÄÁËÎÄÕ£¬Ï£Íû¿ÉÒÔÏû³ýÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÎó½â¡£ We realized that some expression of our manuscript may be ambiguous because we are not native English speakers, although we have tried our best. Now we have revised the manuscript and hope it can be easy understood. Note that the conclusions are not affected. |
2Â¥2009-12-29 15:04:46
ysxnj
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 444
- É¢½ð: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 292
- ÔÚÏß: 79.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 939920
- ×¢²á: 2010-01-10
- רҵ: Ö²ÎïÒÅ´«Ñ§
3Â¥2010-01-16 12:26:01
steven_G
Òø³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 277.6
- Ìû×Ó: 36
- ÔÚÏß: 32.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 844020
- ×¢²á: 2009-09-09
- רҵ: Ó¦Óø߷Ö×Ó»¯Ñ§ÓëÎïÀí
¡ï ¡ï
sirljz(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷»¶Ó³£À´ 1-20 18:57
sirljz(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷»¶Ó³£À´ 1-20 18:57
|
¡°ÓÉÓÚÎÒÃǵÄÎÄÕÂÔÚÏà¹ØµØ·½Ã»ÓÐдÇå³þ£¬±í´ïµÃ²»Ì«Ã÷ÀÊ£¬ÒÔÖÂÉó¸åÈ˶ÔÎÒÃǵŤ×÷ÓÐÎó½â¡£ÏÖÔÚÎÒÐÞ¸ÄÁËÎÄÕ£¬Ï£Íû¿ÉÒÔÏû³ýÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÎó½â¡± "Maybe ambiguous statement in relevant description cause the editors' misunderstanding towards our work. To dispel previous misunderstanding, now I have revised my paper to clear up these equivocal sentences. " ¸ø·Òëһϣ¬ËäÈ»·ÒëµÄ²»ºÃ£¬Ï£ÍûÄܸøµã½ð±Ò°É£¬°³ÏëÇóÎÄÕ£¬×ÜÊÇû½ð±Ò£¬Ð»Ð»À²£¡ |
4Â¥2010-01-20 01:05:37
ysm56789
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
ÂæÍÕ
- ·ÒëEPI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 416 (˶ʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 3.503
- ½ð±Ò: 21031.5
- É¢½ð: 124
- ºì»¨: 41
- ɳ·¢: 7
- Ìû×Ó: 5778
- ÔÚÏß: 665.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 173752
- ×¢²á: 2006-01-21
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Á÷Ðв¡Ñ§·½·¨ÓëÎÀÉúͳ¼Æ
- ¹ÜϽ: º£Íⲩºó
¡ï ¡ï
sirljz(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷ 1-20 18:58
sirljz(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷ 1-20 18:58
|
ÓÉÓÚÎÒÃǵÄÎÄÕÂÔÚÏà¹ØµØ·½Ã»ÓÐдÇå³þ£¬±í´ïµÃ²»Ì«Ã÷ÀÊ£¬ÒÔÖÂÉó¸åÈ˶ÔÎÒÃǵŤ×÷ÓÐÎó½â¡£ÏÖÔÚÎÒÐÞ¸ÄÁËÎÄÕ£¬Ï£Íû¿ÉÒÔÏû³ýÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÎó½â¡£ According to your recommendations, we have revised our manuscript which may be ambiguous in several parts and apologized for the misunderstandings that our previous work caused. |

5Â¥2010-01-20 05:04:19














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
¡°Now we have revised the manuscript and hope it can be easy understood¡±ÖеÄeasyÓ¦¸ÄΪeasily°É
10