应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 交流 » 一篇难产论文的投稿直播（连载）
52/1返回列表
查看: 4945  |  回复: 56
只看楼主 @他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

schf0301

金虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 一篇难产论文的投稿直播（连载）

2009年年初，模拟出现新的结果，和老师探讨用理论分析，感觉很有价值，于是打算向比较高的杂志投稿，初步敲定PRL，准备开始写文章。于是调研PRL的文章结构，写作语气，格式。然后对模拟结果进行系统理论分析，跟经典理论计算结果对比等。
2009年4月份，理论分析完成，文章初稿也写出来了，请老师帮忙修改。
2009年5月7日左右，初稿完成，投到PRL了。
心理多少有些侥幸，因为毕竟PRL的档次有点太高，权当实验了。

[ Last edited by lby1258 on 2010-6-5 at 10:29 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢
1楼 2009-12-17 12:14:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

schf0301

金虫 (著名写手)
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
zhenghaiw(金币+8,VIP+0):感谢连载 12-17 13:44
2009年12月10日经过两个多月时间的漫长等待，终于等到审稿意见了，具体如下：

We have now received the referee report(s) on this brief communication, which is being considered by Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. The referee(s) have recommended that you make some amendments to your brief communication.
Please can you amend your brief communication following the referee recommendations, and then send us the amended version together with a list of the changes you have made. This will help the referee(s) to make the final decision.
We would be grateful if you could complete your amendments as quickly as possible and send in your amended brief communication and electronic files by 8 January 2010. If we receive your brief communication after this date, it may be treated as a new submission, so please let us know if you will need more time.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
Yours sincerely

First referee's report
This paper reports on ****. The paper quite concise, clear and straight to the point. It shows an interesting *****.
These phenomena are interesting, nevertheless the authors must provide more clarification on the physics, numerics and originality of this phenomenon before acceptance of their manuscript.
1. *****
2. ****
3. *****
4. *****
5. *****
6. *****
7. *****
8.*****
9. *****

Second referee's report
This paper presents some new and interesting results on t*****. The modeling predicts******. This work has potentially significant implications for *****. The manuscript is well written, and is suitable for publication in Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, but it would be helpful if the authors could further clarify the following points:
1. ******；
2. ******。

问题依旧不太少，不过审稿人态度比较正面，没有上次第二个审稿人那么有敌意了
赞一下(10人) 回复此楼
12楼2009-12-17 13:36:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 57 个回答

schf0301

金虫 (著名写手)

文章被PRL拒掉

2009年5月20日左右，收到PRL编辑部的来信，文章没有送审稿人评审，直接被编辑拒掉，理由是这方面研究不够普遍，不能吸引人。
小受打击，毕竟早就有心理准备了。重新修改文章，决定投一个档次合适的杂志。
赞一下 回复此楼
2楼2009-12-17 12:18:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

schf0301

金虫 (著名写手)

转投其它杂志

2009年5月26日，论文经过重新修改，以及格式改变，选定Phys. Plasmas，投其中的letter。论文投出，等待中……
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2009-12-17 12:20:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

schf0301

金虫 (著名写手)

第一次审稿意见

经过漫长的等待，于2009年7月14日收到编辑的来信及两个审稿人的意见，具体如下：
Dear ***
We have received the referee comments on your paper titled "*******", which indicate that it is not appropriate for publication in Physics of Plasmas in its present form. Please revise your manuscript as suggested and submit separate detailed responses to the referees, including a detailed description of the revisions made in the paper. The revised manuscript and responses are due as soon as possible via the PXP web site. These will then be sent back to the referee for further review.
We also need the copyright form for the paper. You can upload a pdf file of the form with the files for your revised paper, or you may email or fax it to us at the number below. The form is available via a link at the bottom of the PXP page. Please feel free to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.
Sincerely,

Editor's Comments:
Please make the following changes in your revised paper.
1. The length of this paper appears to be close to the four-typeset-page limit. If it runs over when typeset, you will be asked to shorten it in the galley proofs.
2. Remove personal pronouns-I, we, our-from the abstract.
3. Each machine mentioned in the abstract or in the text must be given a reference that will direct the reader to general information on its background, design, history, etc. The reference in the abstract should be the full citation, enclosed in brackets. The reference in the text should be numbered in sequence. Give a reference for ***.

Reviewer Comments:
Referee #1 (Remarks):
Comments on Manuscript #***
The manuscript contains significant new research contributions to ***.
After addressing the comments listed below, this manuscript is acceptable for publication in Physics of Plasmas.
The detailed comments are:
(1) ***********
(2) ***********
(3) ***********

Referee #2 (Remarks):
The main result of the paper is observation *******. As stated by authors, ****, but I can expect the *****. This result looks VERY suspicious to me.
The authors only analyzed ********.
The paper is written unclearly. *******.
The paper also contains numerous misleading phrases. For example,*********

The authors must:
1) ******
2) ******
3) ******
Otherwise, I recommend the rejection of this paper.

问题挺多的，第一个审稿人的问题很核心，需要仔细回答，第二个审稿人似乎语气很敌视。
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2009-12-17 12:24:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 57 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭