| 查看: 207 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
WATERpml木虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
【讨论】basis set不同,计算得到的单分子的unoccupied states会不同吗?
|
||
|
When comparing the DOS of isolated molecules as obtained by VASP with the results of other codes which use local basis sets (Siesta, Turbomole), it seems that the states match only up to a certain energy below the vacuum energy. For higher energies (but still below the vacuum energy), neither the number nor the position of the orbitals match necessarily. I focused on the molecule 4-Pyridin-4-yl-phenylamine. Using parameters as comparable as possible, I see 4 unoccupied states below the vacuum energy with Siesta and Turbomole (at approximately the same energies). Using VASP, the DOS matches those results very nicely up to the LUMO+2. 3D-representations of the orbitals are consistent as well. Between the states LUMO+2 and LUMO+3 (according to Siesta and Turbomole), VASP calculates an additional state. By looking at its 3d-representation I can see that this state looks like what is the LUMO+4 (the first state above the vacuum energy) in siesta and turbomole. A very quick test with another plane-wave code, abinit, finds a DOS very similar to what VASP finds. To sum up, in this example I see HOMO LUMO L+1 L+2 L+3 VacEn. L+4 in siesta and turbomole. Vasp finds: HOMO LUMO L+1 L+2 ex L+3 VacEn. where the peak "ex" corresponds to L+4 from siesta and turbomole, and VacEn is the vacuum energy. From 3d representations of the L+3 state I don't think they represent the same orbital. Is it possible that plane-wave and local-basis set codes behave somehow differently concerning unoccupied orbitals? If so, why? There is a related thread, http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp-forum/forum_viewtopic.php?4.6181 There, however, it seems that the calculation of states above the vacuum energy was the issue (which, I guess, could in principle be solved by setting NBANDS accordingly). I want to emphasize that I see (for at least three molecules i looked at so far) a different DOS also in a certain range of unoccupied states below the vacuum energy. Thanks in advance PS:此问题我们也在VASP Forum发贴:http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp ... pic.php?4.6486#6486,请各位高手不吝赐教! |
» 猜你喜欢
酰胺脱乙酰基
已经有9人回复
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福
已经有3人回复
CSC & MSCA 博洛尼亚大学能源材料课题组博士/博士后招生|MSCA经费充足、排名优
已经有5人回复
有70后还继续奋斗在职场上的吗?
已经有6人回复
博士延得我,科研能力直往上蹿
已经有7人回复
退学或坚持读
已经有27人回复
面上基金申报没有其他的参与者成吗
已经有5人回复
遇见不省心的家人很难过
已经有22人回复













回复此楼