| ²é¿´: 3675 | »Ø¸´: 46 | |||||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||||
penghuabeiÌú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
|
[½»Á÷]
һƪSCI£¬Àúʱ½Ó½üÒ»Ä꣬ËÄ´ÎͶ¸å£¬Èý´Î±»¾Ü£¬×îºó½ÓÊÕ!
|
||||
|
ÎÒµÄһƪSCI¾¹ýÁË4´ÎͶ¸å£¬Èý´Î±»¾Ü£¬×îºó×ÜËã±»½ÓÊÕÁË£¬ÆäÖеÄÇúÕÛÒÑÄÑÒÔÑÔÓï¡£²»¹ýÕâ´ÎͶ¸å¹ý³Ì»ýÀÛÁËÐí¶à¾Ñ飬ͬʱ¸ÐлСľ³æÉÏµÄ³æ³æÃÇ£¬¼ÇµÃÓÐλ³æ³æËµ¹ý£º¡°Ò»ÆªÎÄÕÂ×ÜÓб»½ÓÊÕµÄÒ»Ìì¡£¡±ÕýÊÇÔÚÕâ¾ä»°µÄ¹ÄÀøÏ£¬ÎÒ¾ÀúÁ˽ӽüÒ»ÄêµÄͶ¸å£¬±»¾Ü£¬ÔÙͶ¸åµÄ·´¸´¹ý³Ì¡£Í¬Ê±£¬¾¹ýÕâÆªÎÄÕµĶÍÁ¶£¬ÎÒ¾õµÃÒÔºó´ó¼ÒͶ¸åÆäʵ¿ÉÒÔ¶àÑ¡Ôñ¼¸¸öÔÓÖ¾×÷ΪºóÑ¡£¬´ÓÓ°ÏìÒò×ӸߵÄͶÆð£¬ÕâÒ»´ÎÎÒ¾ÍÕâô¸ÉµÄ¡£²¢ÇÒ£¬¾ÍÏñÐí¶àǰ±²Ëµ¹ýµÄ£¬´óÐÞµÄÎÄÕÂÖ»ÒªÈÏÈÏÕæÕæ¸ù¾ÝÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒªÇóÐÞ¸ÄÎÄÕ±»½ÓÊյĻú»áºÜ´óµÄ¡£ÎÒÕâÆªÎÄÕ¾ÍÊÇ×îºÃµÄÒ»¸öÀý×Ó¡£ÎªÁ˸ÐлСľ³æ¼°³æ³æÃÇ£¬ÏÂÃæÁгöÁËͶ¸åµÄÈ«¹ý³Ì£¬Ï£Íû¶Ô´ó¼ÒÓаïÖú¡£ µÚÒ»´ÎͶ¸å£º Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2009Äê1ÔÂ16ÈÕͶ¸å 2009Äê2ÔÂ5Èվݸ壬Á¬±à¼ÕâÒ»¹Ø¶¼Ã»Óйý£¬ÏÂÃæ¸½ÉϾÜÐÅ¡£ Thank you for submitting your article to the Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. This manuscript has been received and reviewed by the editorial board. Unfortunately, we regret to inform you that we are unable to publish it. Due to the high demand for space within the pages of this Journal, we must decline a portion of manuscripts with editorial review, allowing the authors to send their manuscript to another journal without delay. Such a decision is made by the board of editors when it appears that the manuscript is unlikely to succeed in the competition for the limited available space. The main aspects considered are: the originality and novelty of ideas put forward in the manuscript; the usual scope of the Journal; the likelihood that the manuscript would be of great interest to typical readers of the Journal, and particularly those working in the same general area of colloid and interface science; the degree to which the manuscript focuses on important new results, in view of the stringent page space limitations faced by scientific journals; and,the writing style, including English grammar and usage. µÚ¶þ´ÎͶ¸å£º Surface Science 2009Äê2ÔÂ5ÈÕͶ¸å 2009Äê3ÔÂ9Èվݸ壬ÕâÒ»´ÎÕÒÁËÉó¸åÈËÁË£¬Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÆäʵÎÒÈÏΪÍêȫӦ¸ÃÔÚ´óÐÞ·¶Î§µÄ£¬µ«ÊDZ༻¹ÊǾݸåÁË£¬ÏÂÃæ¸½ÉÏÒâ¼û¡£ The reviewers have raised some serious points on your manuscript. Accordingly, I regret to inform you that the manuscript is not accepted for publication in Surface Science. I thought that you would be interested in the comments of the referees, and I have pasted a copy of them below. It is our policy to recommend to authors whose paper has not been accepted for publication that they consider another journal rather than provide Surface Science with a rebuttal. Should you wish to submit a new manuscript on a similar topic, please indicate several suggested referees and the reference number of the present manuscript in the Comments section of EES. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, C.T. Campbell Editor-in-Chief Surface Science Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The authors report XX characterization of XXX on the surface of XXX nanoparticles. While this referee does not have any doubt in the technical correctness of the report, he cannot see why we should do XXXX. In other words, are there such critical differences in nanoparticle applications depending on the surfactant XXXX condition? This referee seriously doubts that. 2009Äê3ÔÂ10ÈÕ Ò²ÊÇÒòΪСľ³æµÄÔÒò£¬¿´ÉÏÃæÌáµ½¿ÉÒÔ¸ú±à¼ÉêÊö£¬ÓÚÊÇÎÒдÁË·âÓʼþÏëÈñ༸ø¸ö»ú»á¡£ 2009Äê3ÔÂ13ÈÕ ±à¼»¹ÊǾݸ壬ÏÂÃæ¸½Éϱà¼ÓʼþµÄÖ÷ÌåÄÚÈÝ¡£ÎÒÈÏΪ£¬Èç¹û±à¼²»Ï²»¶ÄãµÄÎÄÕ£¬¿ÉÒÔÕҺܶàÀíÓɵľܵôµÄ¡£ I understand your request. We decided to reject your paper not only because the referee did not appreciate it, but also (and mainly) because your paper is so poorly explained that the reader (myself included) cannot be exactly sure what you are trying to say in many places. Even the 1st two sentences of the Abstract are very poorly written. You need to write more clearly and explain more details. Also, your arguments below about the importance of this centers around their behavior in liquid solution, but your FTIR measurements are in no liquid. Are you sure the layer structure does not change between conditions? You therefore also need to address this. Finally you need to also explain early in the Introduction why this work is important, with references. Sincerely, Charles T. Campbell µÚÈý´ÎͶ¸å Surface and Coating Technology 2009Äê3ÔÂ17ÈÕͶ¸å 2009Äê3ÔÂ31Èվݸ壬ÔÒòºÜ¼òµ¥£¬²»ÔÚÔÓÖ¾ÄÚÈÝ·¶Î§ÄÚ¡£ÓÚÊÇÂíÉÏ»»ÆÚ¿¯ÔÙͶ¡£ Your paper has been found to be outside the remit of Surface and Coatings Technology. Therefore, we are recommending submission to another journal dealing with nanoparticle preparation and processing. With Regards, Yves Pauleau Editor Surface and Coatings Technology µÚËÄ´ÎͶ¸å Applied Surface Science 2009Äê4ÔÂ1ÈÕͶ¸å 2009Äê4ÔÂ7ÈÕRobert L. Opila×÷Ϊ±à¼²¢·ÖÅä¸å¼þºÅ 2009Äê5ÔÂ4ÈÕÕÒµ½Éó¸åÈË 2009Äê6ÔÂ14ÈÕÉó¸åÒâ¼û·µ»Ø£¬´óÐÞ¡£ÓÉÓÚÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÌ«¶à¾Í²»ÁгöÀ´ÁË¡£ 2009Äê8ÔÂ11ÈÕ´óÐÞÍê³ÉͶ¸å¡£ 2009Äê8ÔÂ19ÈÕͬһ¸öÉó¸åÈ˽ÓÊÖ£¬¿ªÊ¼Éó¸å 2009Äê9ÔÂ24ÈÕÉó¸å·µ»Ø£¬¼ÌÐø´óÐÞ¡£¸ù¾ÝÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÀ´¿´£¬±¾À´ÎÒÈÏΪӦ¸ÃÊÇСÐ޵쬵«±à¼»¹ÊÇ·ÅÔÚÁË´óÐ޵ķ¶Î§ÄÚ¡£ÏÂÃæ¸½Éϲ¿·ÖµÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û¡£ Reviewer #1: I think the paper is appropriate in its revised form for publication in Applied Surface Science. The reviewers have addressed all the points I raised in my initial review, and I think the manuscript is more understandable in its current form. I have a few lingering questions/concerns I'd like them to address. 2009Äê10ÔÂ15Èձ༽ÓÊÖ 2009Äê10ÔÂ22ÈÕÉó¸åÈËͬÒâÉó¸å 2009Äê11ÔÂ26ÈÕ½ÓÊÕ£¬¿´µ½ÏÂÃæµÄÒâ¼ûÆäʵÎÒÒѾûÓÐʲô¸Ð¾õÁË¡£ I am pleased to confirm that your paper has been accepted for publication in Applied Surface Science. Comments from the Editor and Reviewers can be found below. Thank you for submitting your work to this journal. With kind regards, Robert L. Opila Editor Applied Surface Science Comments from the Editors and Reviewers: good job addressing reviewer's suggestions. thank you. [ Last edited by nxssw on 2009-11-27 at 20:40 ] |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
Ͷ¸å¼°Ð´×÷¾Ñé | ×ÊÔ´1 |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
286Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
085601Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
302Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñл¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶µ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸985
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
328Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ó¢ÓïÁù¼¶551£¬ÓпÆÑоÀú
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
»úеר˶325£¬Ñ°ÕÒµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶306Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
»ï°éÃÇ£¬×£ÎÒÉúÈÕ¿ìÀÖ°É
ÒѾÓÐ26È˻ظ´
333Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
0854¿ØÖƹ¤³Ì 359Çóµ÷¼Á ¿É¿çרҵ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
| ¹§Ï²¹§Ï²°¡ |
2Â¥2009-11-26 20:37:34
penghuabei
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 60 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1276
- É¢½ð: 6811
- ºì»¨: 13
- Ìû×Ó: 3116
- ÔÚÏß: 2718.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 696104
- ×¢²á: 2009-02-04
- רҵ: ½ðÊô·Ç¾§Ì¬¡¢×¼¾§ºÍÄÉÃ×¾§
3Â¥2009-11-26 20:38:51
lmm5373
ľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 18 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3655.5
- É¢½ð: 2814
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 3818
- ÔÚÏß: 1537.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 740052
- ×¢²á: 2009-04-04
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ƫ΢·Ö·½³Ì

4Â¥2009-11-26 21:02:58
Jimmyoung
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 3134.9
- É¢½ð: 50
- ºì»¨: 1
- ɳ·¢: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 902
- ÔÚÏß: 116.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 894902
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-06
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: µçÁ¦ÏµÍ³
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
ÕæÊDz»ÈÝÒ×£¡ ²»¹ý²©Ê¿¸Õ¿ªÊ¼¾ÍÄÜ·¢±íºÜÀ÷º¦ÁË |
5Â¥2009-11-26 21:05:08
penghuabei
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 60 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1276
- É¢½ð: 6811
- ºì»¨: 13
- Ìû×Ó: 3116
- ÔÚÏß: 2718.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 696104
- ×¢²á: 2009-02-04
- רҵ: ½ðÊô·Ç¾§Ì¬¡¢×¼¾§ºÍÄÉÃ×¾§
6Â¥2009-11-26 21:07:21
xukewei
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 18 (СѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.126
- ½ð±Ò: 5146.5
- É¢½ð: 662
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 983
- ÔÚÏß: 497.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 85195
- ×¢²á: 2005-08-09
- רҵ: ÉúÎïµØÖÊѧ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| ˵ʵÔÚµÄÂ¥Ö÷µÄÔËÆøÕæµÄºÜºÃ£¬Ã¿´ÎͶ¸å¶¼ÔÚÒ»¸öÔÂ×óÓÒ£¬Èç¹ûÕý³£Èý¸öÔµĻ°Ò»Äê°ëÒ²¹»Çº¡£×£¸£Â¥Ö÷£¡ |

7Â¥2009-11-26 21:09:52
stevenaaa
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 858.6
- É¢½ð: 10
- Ìû×Ó: 771
- ÔÚÏß: 131.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 321563
- ×¢²á: 2007-03-11
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÖÜΧѪ¹Ü¼²²¡
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| ¹§Ï²Â¥Ö÷£¡²©Ê¿ÉúÑIJŸոտªÊ¼¾ÍÓÐSCIÁË£¡ÔÞÒ»¸ö£¡ |
8Â¥2009-11-26 21:11:27
| ¹§Ï²¹§Ï² |
9Â¥2009-11-26 21:13:35
simplesoul
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 7556.5
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 1036
- ÔÚÏß: 1209Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 72888
- ×¢²á: 2005-06-06
- רҵ: ·ÖÎöÒÇÆ÷ÓëÊÔ¼Á
10Â¥2009-11-26 21:18:32













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
20