24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 336  |  回复: 2

宇宙逻辑

银虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 93、Numerical Comparison, Complete Derivation and Precise Measurement Experiment 已有1人参与

Preprint of CERN doi :10.5281/zenodo.20452826
or https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20452826
My academic identifier: orcid id: 0009-0005-2185-5790. You may go to the official academic website to retrieve and view relevant research content.
Readers may copy this number to search on the official zenodo website (search by English title or English keywords) to view the full English and Chinese pdf texts.

Abstract
Modern relativistic quantum mechanics universally acknowledges that electrons exhibit highfrequency transverse quantum oscillations, a fact widely verified and accepted in the physics community. However, long-standing theoretical deficiencies exist in relevant research: the two independent physical concepts of electron entity diameter and transverse oscillation extension range have not been strictly distinguished, and systematic quantitative derivation of their scale ratio is lacking. At present, all parameters of electron size and oscillation amplitude are theoretical estimated values or upper limits from highenergy experiments, without highprecision measured data or unified internationally accepted standard values.
Based on the 2022 CODATA official fundamental physical constants, this paper uses a general copyfriendly character format to completely and stepwise derive two scale ratios between the transverse oscillation range and the electron size, clarifying the limitations and uncertainties of existing theoretical parameters. In view of the current theoretical gaps, this paper designs a special precision measurement experiment scheme to determine the real electron diameter, transverse oscillation amplitude, oscillation frequency and true scale ratio, so as to fill the blank in precision experimental research on electron oscillation scale.
The results show that the diffraction and deflection behaviors of electrons in a slit system are not dominated by the extremely small electron size, but controlled by the inherent transverse oscillation range, which is much larger than the electron size. The wavelike phenomena observed in electron singleslit and doubleslit experiments are essentially statistical results of the interaction between electron inherent oscillations and slit wall electromagnetism, rather than the probability wave selfinterference claimed by mainstream theories. This study can provide theoretical and experimental support for revising the microscopic mechanism of electron diffraction and improving the system of microscopic particle physics.
Keywords
electron oscillation; physical diameter; transverse amplitude; scale ratio; single and doubleslit diffraction; precision measurement
1 Introduction
The microscopic oscillation mechanism of photons has a sound theoretical and experimental system. The 360° spiral oscillation and spatial extension characteristics of photons are the core causes of photon slit scattering, energy level transition and trajectory deflection.
As a charged microscopic particle with real mass, electrons are clearly proved by relativistic quantum mechanics to exhibit continuous, spontaneous and highfrequency threedimensional transverse oscillations, a conclusion universally recognized in physics. Nevertheless, three key defects have persisted in this field for more than a century:
First, the academic community has long confused the geometric size of electron entity and the spatial range of motion oscillation without strict physical definition. Second, key parameters such as electron physical diameter and transverse oscillation amplitude are only theoretical derived values or experimental upper limits, lacking highprecision measured fixed values. Third, mainstream theories deliberately avoid the real physical effects of electron microscopic oscillations, and long rely on the hypotheses of probability wave and selfinterference to explain electron slit diffraction, deviating from the physical nature of real particle interactions.
Existing research can only qualitatively judge that the electron oscillation range is much larger than the electron size, but cannot quantitatively give accurate ratio relations and real physical parameters. Accordingly, this paper completes accurate numerical derivation based on authoritative constants, clarifies the deficiencies of current theoretical data, and proposes a feasible precision measurement experiment scheme to improve the basic theoretical system of electron microscopic scale and oscillation characteristics.

93、Numerical Comparison, Complete Derivation and Precise Measurement Experiment
回复此楼
光本源统一理论,物理理论研究者,学术身份ORCID:0009-0005-2185-5790,全部完整研究文稿存档于关联欧洲核子中心的Zenodo预印本平台。完整原文可通过ORCID
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Xu_shi_wei

新虫 (小有名气)

★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
你这也是波本体论?
发自小木虫手机客户端
2楼2026-10-12 14:08:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

宇宙逻辑

银虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by Xu_shi_wei at 2026-10-12 14:08:31
你这也是波本体论?

并不是波本体论。波本体论依旧把光归属于电磁场波动。
我的观点恰恰相反,光属于宇宙底层独立的能量态本体,光先于电磁现象存在,光不是电磁波,也不是场激发出来的产物。
电场与磁场全部由电荷体系产生,电磁场不能脱离电荷源在真空自激传播,电磁波的传统物理模型本身存在底层逻辑缺陷。二者的底层出发点完全不一样,欢迎进一步交流探讨。
光本源统一理论,物理理论研究者,学术身份ORCID:0009-0005-2185-5790,全部完整研究文稿存档于关联欧洲核子中心的Zenodo预印本平台。完整原文可通过ORCID
3楼2026-10-13 08:48:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 宇宙逻辑 的主题更新
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见