| 查看: 39 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
67、Criticism on the Logical Contradiction and Physical Essence
|
|
Preprint of CERN doi :10.5281/zenodo.20032747 or https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20032747 My academic identifier: orcid id: 0009-0005-2185-5790. You may go to the official academic website to retrieve and view relevant research content. Readers may copy this number to search on the official zenodo website (search by English title or English keywords) to view the full English and Chinese pdf texts. Abstract General Relativity equates gravity with spacetime curvature and establishes a geometric interpretation system of gravity. This system can only approximately match the observation data through parameter fitting at the solar system scale, but its theoretical framework has inherent logical defects that cannot be self-consistent. Based on the objective reality of the real three-dimensional universe, this paper emphasizes that no celestial body in the universe exists in isolation. It is not only surrounded by a few nearby celestial bodies, but surrounded by countless cosmic substances and celestial bodies at different distances in all directions, and each substance has an independent gravitational effect. Celestial bodies in different directions and distances have completely inconsistent requirements on the direction and curvature of spacetime curvature. The theory cannot determine which curvature standard to follow, nor can it construct a special spacetime curvature form for countless differentiated gravitational demands, thus forming an irreconcilable fundamental logical paradox. At the same time, this paper analyzes the parameter fitting attribute of the theory, the explanatory gap of the large-scale cosmic structure, the incompatibility with the microscopic strong interaction and other defects. By comparing with the rigor and universality of Newton's system of universal gravitation, it clarifies that General Relativity deviates from the real physical operation mechanism of the universe. Keywords General Relativity; spacetime curvature; three-dimensional universe; multi-source gravity; curvature conflict; logical paradox; parameter fitting; universal gravitation 1.Introduction After the advent of General Relativity, it has gradually become the core theory for explaining gravitational phenomena in mainstream physics. This theory abandons the physical concept of traditional gravitational interaction between celestial bodies, and attributes gravity to the derivative effect of spacetime geometric curvature. It holds that mass and energy can change the shape of spacetime, and the orbits of celestial bodies only extend naturally along the geodesics of spacetime curvature. Relying on the numerical matching of observation phenomena such as the perihelion precession of Mercury and the gravitational deflection of light, coupled with the perfect construction of mathematical models, this theory has long occupied the mainstream position in gravity research. However, this theory has always deliberately avoided a fundamental objective law of the universe: no celestial body in the universe exists in isolation, nor is it only affected by a few nearby celestial bodies. Instead, countless stars, planets, galaxies and interstellar materials are distributed in all directions, front, back, left, right, up and down, and all these substances have a real gravitational connection with the central celestial body. This leads to an unavoidable core theoretical question: according to the logic of spacetime curvature, mass determines spacetime curvature. Then countless celestial bodies at different distances and in different directions in all directions correspond to different spacetime curvature directions, and the required curvature sizes are completely different. At this time, the theory cannot answer the key question: according to which celestial body's standard should spacetime bend? Should it be based on nearby celestial bodies or distant celestial bodies? Can spacetime curvature be changed at will? When calculating which gravitational force, a curvature form corresponding to that force is temporarily bent? If each celestial body has a custom-made spacetime curvature, the same space must carry countless sets of mutually contradictory curvature standards at the same time, which is completely incompatible in spatial geometric structure and physical logic, and has no practical calculable basic conditions. This is the fundamental crux that the spacetime curvature theory has been unable to positively respond to and justify. In addition, there are explanatory gaps in the large-scale structure of galaxies, and the microscopic nuclear strong interaction cannot be included in the theoretical framework, which is enough to show that this theory is not a universal law of cosmic operation, but only a mathematical fitting model constructed to adapt to local observation data.  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有10人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有11人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有13人回复
