24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2598  |  回复: 24
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ljl8209

木虫 (知名作家)


[交流] 文章 被拒了 好惨啊 已有1人参与

Reviewer #1: I cannot recommend publication of this MS. I have the following concerns:

- the choice of chromophores goes back to the 90's, when lots of papers regarding the design of NLO chromophores were published by numerous groups. Although authors used a reference, I cannot really discover the benefit for the use of particular these compounds? Where is the "world record" of these compounds? Is the increase just an increase or is this the maximum?


Again, my impression is that the results obtained are not exciting. There is no new structural concept. It is just an add of that what has been almost known and would help to fill table books.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wlalbert

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by castep at 2009-11-19 16:08:

我没看懂这句话是什么意思

众所周知的东东,可以写入手册性book中
6楼2009-11-19 16:12:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wlalbert

金虫 (正式写手)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by antiq at 2009-11-19 18:20:
楼主应该好好考虑审稿人的意见是否正确,然后再考虑是否改投或弃投。
我两篇东西,刚进入一个新方向时写的,审稿人说没新意,我决定把他们永久性放置了。

还是投出去的好,找个档次低的。毕竟是辛苦写的。有时候论文就是论坛交流,不需要多大新意。
19楼2009-12-26 16:30:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 ljl8209 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见