| 查看: 2596 | 回复: 24 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
ljl8209
|
[交流]
文章 被拒了 好惨啊 已有1人参与
|
||
|
Reviewer #1: I cannot recommend publication of this MS. I have the following concerns: - the choice of chromophores goes back to the 90's, when lots of papers regarding the design of NLO chromophores were published by numerous groups. Although authors used a reference, I cannot really discover the benefit for the use of particular these compounds? Where is the "world record" of these compounds? Is the increase just an increase or is this the maximum? Again, my impression is that the results obtained are not exciting. There is no new structural concept. It is just an add of that what has been almost known and would help to fill table books. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有17人回复
-
不自信的我
已经有5人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有4人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 好惨啊！求助啊！走过路过的前辈们帮忙分析啊~~~
已经有1人回复
- 为投出的论文祈福啊！！carbon悲剧嘞。。。
已经有186人回复
- 公派联合培养经历兼顾科研心得
已经有169人回复
- 大杯具啊,投国内某SCI....被拒
已经有26人回复
- 安慰一下我吧
已经有28人回复
- 【经验分享】英国工作陪伴(dependant)签证2000通过经验
已经有67人回复
- SCI文章投稿历程
已经有39人回复
stevenaaa
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 858.6
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 771
- 在线: 131.1小时
- 虫号: 321563
- 注册: 2007-03-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 周围血管疾病
17楼2009-11-23 23:26:30