24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 7462  |  回复: 38

zhengl_bj

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 洪堡奖学金申请注意事项及建议-3已有20人参与

以下是一个如何写好研究计划的说明(忘记下载的地方了,在此致歉!我个人觉得这个说明很重要,我反复看了好多遍):
When you are applying for a research degree, like the PhD, you will very probably have to write a research proposal as a part of your application file. A PhD is awarded mainly as the result of your making a genuine contribution to the state of knowledge in a field of your choice. Even though this is not the Nobel Prize yet, getting the degree means you have added something to what has previously been known on the subject you have researched. But first you have to prove you are capable of making such a contribution, and therefore write a research proposal that meets certain standards. The goal of a research proposal (RP) is to present and justify a research idea you have and to present the practical ways in which you think this research should be conducted.  
2 When you are writing a RP, keep in mind that it will enter a competition, being read in line with quite a few other RPs. You have to come up with a document that has an impact upon the reader: write clearly and well structured so that your message gets across easily. Basically, your RP has to answer three big questions: what research project will you undertake, why is important to know that thing and how will you proceed to make that research.

4 M! I' D7 q; [In order to draw the researcher's attention upon your paper, write an introduction with impact, and that leads to the formulation of your hypothesis. The research hypothesis has to be specific, concise (one phrase) and to lead to the advancement of the knowledge in the field in some way. Writing the hypothesis in a concise manner and, first, coming up with a good hypothesis is a difficult mission. This is actually the core of your application: you're going to a university to do this very piece of research. Compared to this, the rest of the application is background scenery. Take your time to think of it. When you have an idea, be careful at the formulation. A well-written hypothesis is something of an essay's thesis: it provides a statement that can be tested (argues ahead one of the possible answers to a problem), it is an idea, a concept, and not a mere fact, and is summed up in one phrase. In some cases, you will have no idea what the possible answer to a problem worth being researched is, but you will be able to think of a way to solve that problem, and find out the answer in the meantime. It's ok in this case, to formulate a research question, rather than a hypothesis. Let those cases be rare, in any way.

1 Another piece of advice when writing your hypothesis, regarding the trendy research fields: chances are great that they're trendy because somebody has already made that exciting discovery, or wrote that splendid paper that awoke everybody's interest in the first place. If you're in one of these fields, try to get a fresh point of view upon the subject; make new connections, don't be 100% mainstream. This will make the project even more stimulating for the reader. Imagine that you are writing about the trendiest subject, with absolutely no change in the point of view, and you are given the chance to make the research. Trends come and go, fast; what are the chances that, in four years' time, when your research is done and you are ready to publish your results, one of those well-known professors who dispose of huge research grants has already said whatever you had to say?

Remember how, in a structured essay, right after the thesis you would present the organisation of your essay, by enumerating the main arguments you were going to present? Same thing should happen in a RP. After stating your thesis, you should give a short account of your answers to those three questions mention earlier. State, in a few phrases, what will be learned from your research, that your project will make a difference, and why is that important to be known. You will have to elaborate on both of these later in the paper.

The next step in writing your proposal is to prove that that particular piece of research has not been done yet. This section is usually called Literature Review. Inside it, you have to enumerate and critically analyze an impressive list of boring bibliography. The conclusion you should - objectively! - reach is that your idea of research has not been undertaken yet. Even more, you use this opportunity to prove solid theoretical knowledge in the field, and build the theoretical bases of your project. One tip: don't review all the articles and books in the fields even if you mention them in the bibliography list; pay attention in your analysis to those you will build on. Another one: avoid jargon when writing your RP. The chances are great that the person(s) who will read your and another 1000 research proposals are not specialists in that very field - niche you are examining. If you are applying for a grant with or foundation or something similar, it might happen that those reading your paper are not even professors, but recruiters, donors, etc. And even if they actually are professors, one of the reasons busy people like them agree to undertake a huge, and sometimes voluntary, work, is the desire to meet some diversity, some change from their work - so maybe they'll read applications for another specialisation. The capacity to get your message across in clear, easy-to-grasp concepts and phrases is one of the winning papers' most important advantages.

So far, you have proven you have a research idea, that you are familiar with the field, and that your idea is new. Now, why should your project be worth researching? Because it advances knowledge, ok. But is this knowledge that anybody will need? Maybe nobody knows for sure how the shoelaces were being tied in the XIXth century, but who cares, beyond two lace-tying specialists? Find arguments to convince the reader that s/he should give you money for that research: practical use, accelerating the development of knowledge in your or other fields, opening new research possibilities, a better understanding of facts that will allow a more appropriate course of action are possible reasons. Be clear and specific. Don't promise to save the world, it might be too much to start with. Even James Bond succeeds that only towards the end of the movie.

We approach now one of the most difficult parts of writing a research proposal: the methodology. In short, what actions are you going to take in order to answer the question? When will you know whether the hypothesis has been proven wrong, or has survived enough tests to be considered, for now, valid? Those tests and the way you are supposed to handle them to give rigor to your research is what is understood under methods. Methods divide in qualitative (interviews, questionnaires) and quantitative (statistics, stuff that deals intensively with numbers). For some projects qualitative methods are more appropriate, for some quantitative, while for most a mixture of the two is adequate. You should pick your methods and justify your choice. Research methodology, however, is too a complicated thing to be explained here. And this is why it's so tough: not much attention is given to teaching it in Eastern Europe. Try, before writing your RP, to read a bit more about methodology - on the Internet you will find for sure some articles - and decide which methods suit your project best. Don't forget: reading theoretical pieces of your work and providing a critical analysis of those is also a kind of research. It's fine to provide a rough schedule of your research; some grant programs will also require a detailed budget, even though for scholarships this is unlikely.

Conclusions: After working your way through the difficult methodological part, you only have to write your conclusions. Shortly recap why your hypothesis is new, why it advances knowledge, why is it worth researching and how, from a practical point of view, are you going to do that. Overall, the capacity of your project to answer the research question should come out crystal clear from the body of the paper, and especially from the conclusions. If this happens, it means you have a well-written RP, and you have just increased you chances for having a successful application.

One last word: how big should your RP be? In most cases, this is specified in the application form. If it is not, we suggest that you keep it at about 1500 words (that's 3 pages, single-spaced, with 12 size Times New Roman). In fewer words it can be really tough to write a good RP. With more you might bore your readers. Which we hope will not happen.

Good luck!


Research Proposal (2): Qualitative orientation

Crystal Loh Wai Ying; M. Phil Proposal; Dept. of Sociology, HKU.

(I) Proposed Title
(II) Introduction
(III) Brief Literature Review

Environmental Variables and Crime
Rational Choice
Crime Prevention Through Environment Design (CPTED)
(IV) Methodology

Participant Observation
Individual Interviews
Community Observation
Analysis of Official/Unofficial Statistic
(V) Proposed Research Time-Table
(VI) References


在此祝各位成功!
回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘贴专辑推荐

催化&材料 德国留学 洪堡基金 AvH洪堡学者
博后 好帖子 postdoc

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

tools888

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
非常有用.不过想当初我联系洪堡的时候,没有参考任何的资料/材料,只是按照自己的理解去写研究计划,准备材料,费了不少劲,但是结果很好...也许是我自己从内心深处就喜欢自己的观点吧.
2楼2009-11-12 22:20:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

dongdonggu

金虫 (著名写手)

LS皆牛人。。。。。。。。
i am right here...
3楼2009-11-12 23:16:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

csuaaa

金虫 (正式写手)

LS皆牛人……
4楼2009-11-13 00:40:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhengl_bj

木虫 (著名写手)

上面的都是牛人
5楼2009-11-13 05:14:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

清风客

木虫 (正式写手)

喜欢在连续之中逼近你的极限,经过剑桥三一学院,我以牛顿之名许愿,思念就像傅利叶级数一样蔓延,当空间只剩下拓扑的语言,映射就成了永垂不朽的诗篇,我给 ...
6楼2009-11-13 11:04:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

iRobot

木虫 (正式写手)

多谢楼主!
7楼2009-11-13 22:00:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhengl_bj

木虫 (著名写手)

不客气!其实大家应该感谢原作者,我只是从别的地方搬过来了而已
8楼2009-11-14 07:41:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

不器

木虫 (正式写手)

很好  很强大
9楼2009-11-14 08:41:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

littlepony

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
仔细看了lz的3篇连贴,好好学习了一下,多谢啊。要是由版主处理一下,做成一个帖子,那就更好了。
10楼2009-11-14 13:43:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zhengl_bj 的主题更新
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[文学芳草园] 累并快乐着 +15 MYHLD521 2024-06-14 15/750 2024-06-18 01:28 by liyeqik
[考博] 34岁读博士晚吗 +31 emitdne 2024-06-13 31/1550 2024-06-17 23:11 by 龙游天下2014202
[基金申请] 太卷了 +12 shuigubio 2024-06-17 23/1150 2024-06-17 22:38 by master_110
[基金申请] 有人中过人文社科类的博后特助吗? +3 outsider1986 2024-06-16 4/200 2024-06-17 19:35 by outsider1986
[高分子] 寻找聚酯反应釜 +3 茕茕恭煮 2024-06-15 4/200 2024-06-17 18:18 by sunliyan123
[基金申请] 我标书代码变了 +44 学员NHuqdk 2024-06-16 58/2900 2024-06-17 17:39 by wenfengw83
[博后之家] 山东大学(青岛)“天然药物生物智造”课题组 招聘“博士后”(年薪20.4-55.6万元) +5 第二种态度 2024-06-11 11/550 2024-06-17 10:08 by 小懂事k
[论文投稿] 二审返修送审10天了,原来一审的3个审稿人只有2个接受了审稿,会邀请新审稿人么? 50+3 huanpo116 2024-06-15 5/250 2024-06-16 10:27 by bobvan
[考博] 上海交大招收材料化学方向科研助理/“申请考核”博士(已招满) +3 灵梦and紫 2024-06-12 4/200 2024-06-15 20:58 by 1822836277
[基金申请] BO4的YQ答辩通知发布了吗? +6 博学笃行 2024-06-11 6/300 2024-06-15 16:04 by 悲催科研狗
[论文投稿] 求机械类四区sci推荐 5+3 迷茫小旷 2024-06-14 4/200 2024-06-15 11:25 by bobvan
[论文投稿] 投了一篇4区的SCI,审稿人一个拒稿,一个小修,编辑给了大修。 +9 安稳22123 2024-06-13 10/500 2024-06-14 23:45 by jurkat.1640
[基金申请] 面上基金有一个(两个)C是不是就没戏了.... 5+3 zzzm116 2024-06-13 17/850 2024-06-14 22:26 by lzt8076
[基金申请] 工材E口JQ有消息了吗 +4 babyduck 2024-06-11 4/200 2024-06-14 17:23 by firepick
[基金申请] 75批博后基金 +10 kyukitu 2024-06-13 13/650 2024-06-14 10:31 by kyukitu
[论文投稿] 文章proof要求使用机构的邮箱 5+3 不可不信缘 2024-06-11 11/550 2024-06-14 07:00 by 3001160025
[论文投稿] 投稿后发现其他作者的邮箱填错了该怎么办呀 10+4 在飞的猪 2024-06-13 6/300 2024-06-14 04:45 by 小虫子咔咔
[有机交流] 原料反应完了,怎么知道是产物还是中间体 +6 小胡在努力 2024-06-11 8/400 2024-06-13 13:33 by 091602
[论文投稿] with editor日期变更 +3 慎独的小花卷 2024-06-12 8/400 2024-06-13 11:00 by 慎独的小花卷
[论文投稿] 摩擦磨损论文投稿 +3 jmysan 2024-06-12 3/150 2024-06-13 08:36 by 莱茵润色
信息提示
请填处理意见