±±¾©Ê¯ÓÍ»¯¹¤Ñ§Ôº2026ÄêÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á¹«¸æ
²é¿´: 695  |  »Ø¸´: 0
µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ­´æµµ¡£

duoxin

Í­³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

ССľ³æ

[½»Á÷] [×ªÔØ] ÈÕ±¾·¢ÏÖµç×Ó×ÔÐýÊǸß㬵¼·¢Éú¹Ø¼ü

Superconductivity: A magnetic isotope effect
Michael Norman1

Michael Norman is in the Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laborato
ry, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA. e-mail: norman@anl.gov
AbstractThe role of phonons in conventional superconductivity ¡ª first determi
ned by isotope substitution ¡ª has been known for over half a century. But ide
ntifying the mechanism in unconventional superconductivity is a much more chal
lenging affair.

In 1950, two key experiments identified the source of superconductivity in con
ventional superconductors1, 2, the results of which Fröhlich predicted ar
ound the same time3. By substituting one isotope for another, researchers obse
rved a change in the transition temperature. This clearly pointed to an involv
ement of the lattice in the superconductivity. Seven years later, based on the
se pioneering results, Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer conceived the correct mi
croscopic theory4. On page 27 of this issue, Terashima et al. demonstrate a di
fferent type of isotope effect that relies on substitution of one kind of magn
etic ion for another5. Consequently, they suggest that high-temperature superc
onductivity results from magnetic, rather than lattice, interactions.

Copper oxide superconductors are composed of metallic CuO2 layers (see Fig. 1)
separated by non-metallic spacer layers. The electronic structure near the Fe
rmi energy consists of a single energy band that is a mixture of copper d and
oxygen p orbitals. It is well known that replacement of the copper ions by oth
er ions (zinc, nickel, cobalt) has a strong influence on the superconducting p
roperties. But we know that impurities break Cooper pairs in unconventional su
perconductors, so this is not an unusual result. On the other hand, this subst
itution also has a large impact on the magnetic properties of these materials.
For instance, a very prominent spin-1 resonance seen in inelastic neutron sca
ttering experiments is strongly altered when zinc is substituted for copper6.


Figure 1 - CuO2 plane in high-temperature superconductors.
The blue atoms are copper ions; the green atoms, oxygen. In the experiment, a
magnetic copper ion is replaced by either a non-magnetic zinc ion or a magneti
c nickel ion (red atom). This influences the spectrum of magnetic excitations
measured by inelastic neutron scattering, and also anomalies in the energy¨Cmo
mentum relation of the electrons observed by angle-resolved photoemission. The
implication is that magnetic interactions may indeed be responsible for high-
temperature superconductivity in these materials.

Full size image (4 KB)
Figures & tables index


To appreciate the significance of this result, we return to affairs half a cen
tury ago. The same electron¨Clattice interaction that gives rise to supercondu
ctivity also affects the dispersion of the energy bands (that is, their energy
versus momentum relation). In the early 1960s, tunnelling measurements exhibi
ted this 'strong coupling' effect that nailed down the theory for conventional
superconductors. Now, fifty years later, a debate has emerged concerning simi
lar strong-coupling effects seen in the high-temperature superconductors, in p
articular with regard to angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy that direct
ly measures the energy¨Cmomentum relation of the electrons7. Several photoemis
sion groups advocate that these strong coupling features are indeed due to lat
tice interactions, as for conventional superconductors. But others argue for m
agnetic interactions. In particular, they believe the spin-1 resonance is resp
onsible for the observed 'kink' in the energy dispersion.

The lattice interaction hypothesis has been tested in an experiment published
last year8, in which the kink shifted on substitution of 16O for 18O. One woul
d think this would have settled the debate, but those measurements have genera
ted a lot of controversy. This has led researchers to consider the second ¡ª m
agnetic ¡ª possibility. But how to test it? As mentioned above, one way to do
this is to replace the magnetic copper ion by another type of ion, and see whe
ther there is a correlation between the change in magnetic behaviour and that
of the energy dispersion of the electrons.

This is indeed what Terashima and co-workers observe5. Their substitution of z
inc in place of copper influences the dispersion kink in much the same way tha
t the spin-1 resonance is affected6 (as seen in neutron scattering measurement
s). And a somewhat different influence is found on the kink upon nickel substi
tution, again correlating with a similar difference in the neutron data. As su
ch, the experiment reported by Terashima et al. provides strong evidence that
the kink is caused by the spin-1 resonance. If so, this implies that magnetic
interactions are indeed the source of high-temperature superconductivity. In s
upport of these conclusions, similar results have been reported recently by an
other photoemission group9.

As with the experiment reported in ref. 8, there are other possible interpreta
tions of the data. Some years ago, the Stanford group observed an influence on
photoemission spectra due to zinc substitution for copper10. Their view, howe
ver, was that zinc substitution enhances charge inhomogeneity, which gives ris
e to the observed changes. Regardless, the 'magnetic isotope effect' reported
by Terashima et al. will probably generate much debate in the coming years, an
d has brought us one step closer, perhaps, to the microscopic theory of these
fascinating superconductors.
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

ÎÊÇþÄĵÃÇåÈçÐí£¬Î¨ÓÐÔ´Í·»îË®À´£¡ ËûÄêÎÒÈôΪÇàµÛ£¬±¨ÓëÌÒ»¨Ò»´¦¿ª£¡
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ duoxin µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] 316Çóµ÷¼Á +7 yyxÏëµ÷¼Á 2026-04-05 7/350 2026-04-07 14:31 by shdgaomin
[¿¼ÑÐ] ¹¤¿Æ 22408 267ÇóÍÆ¼ö +4 wanwan00 2026-04-05 5/250 2026-04-06 22:47 by chenzhimin
[¿¼ÑÐ] µ÷¼ÁÇóÖú£¨ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©£© +3 @6952 2026-04-06 3/150 2026-04-06 21:48 by Ecowxq666£¡
[¿¼ÑÐ] 338Çóµ÷¼Á +4 ÎÒÏëÉϰ¶ii 2026-04-05 4/200 2026-04-06 21:04 by ľ×Ó¾ý1218
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÉúÎïѧÇóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»¦9£¬326·Ö +6 Áõīī 2026-04-06 6/300 2026-04-06 19:36 by lijunpoly
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085410È˹¤ÖÇÄÜ ³õÊÔ316·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á +7 ²ÐÐÇ·÷Êï 2026-03-31 7/350 2026-04-06 10:09 by À¶ÔÆË¼Óê
[¿¼ÑÐ] 086000ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©298µ÷¼ÁÇóÖú +9 ÔªÔªÇàÇà 2026-03-31 12/600 2026-04-05 21:03 by ѧԱ8dgXkO
[¿¼ÑÐ] 301Çóµ÷¼Á +3 XYPLR 2026-04-05 4/200 2026-04-05 19:07 by XYPLR
[¿¼ÑÐ] 313Çóµ÷¼Á +5 º£ÈÕº£ÈÕ 2026-04-04 7/350 2026-04-05 13:58 by imissbao
[¿¼ÑÐ] 320Çóµ÷¼Á +3 Ò»ÑùÔ² 2026-04-04 3/150 2026-04-04 22:29 by à£à£à£0119
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085600µ÷¼Á +4 1amJJ 2026-04-02 4/200 2026-04-04 21:53 by hemengdong
[¿¼ÑÐ] 277Çóµ÷¼Á +4 12A3 2026-04-02 5/250 2026-04-04 20:28 by À¶ÔÆË¼Óê
[¿¼ÑÐ] 298Çóµ÷¼Á +5 zzz£¬£¬r 2026-04-02 8/400 2026-04-04 19:55 by À¶ÔÆË¼Óê
[¿¼ÑÐ] ±¾9Ò»Ö¾Ô¸2 0854µÍ·Öר˶286Çóµ÷¼Á +9 âÖÖ111 2026-04-04 9/450 2026-04-04 11:01 by tangruihua
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0705Àíѧ294Çóµ÷¼Á +3 ³É¹û³É¹ûcg5 2026-04-03 3/150 2026-04-03 14:04 by simons1972
[¿¼ÑÐ] 366Çóµ÷¼ÁÒ»Ö¾Ô¸¶«±±´óѧ +8 ÔËÆøÀ´µÃÈôÓÐËÆÎ 2026-04-02 8/400 2026-04-02 21:39 by dongzh2009
[¿¼ÑÐ] ²ÄÁÏ340·Öµ÷¼Á +7 ÏÄÒ¹Íí·ç_long 2026-04-02 9/450 2026-04-02 21:20 by dongzh2009
[¿¼ÑÐ] 298ÇóBÇøµ÷¼Á +4 zzz£¬£¬r 2026-04-02 5/250 2026-04-02 12:17 by ÍÁľ˶ʿÕÐÉú
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0856³õÊÔ324·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +6 ÏëÉÏѧÇóµ÷ 2026-04-01 6/300 2026-04-02 11:42 by ÐÇ¿ÕÐÇÔÂ
[¿¼ÑÐ] 286Çóµ÷¼Á +5 Sa67890. 2026-04-01 7/350 2026-04-01 19:50 by 6781022
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û