| 查看: 546 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
ACS nano 投稿 已有1人参与
|
发邮件说“Before we proceed, we notice that from the abstract, cover letter the manuscript type is mentioned as 'Review'. However, you have selected 'Article' please update the manuscript type if its a review and resubmit it.”但是type的选项没有这个怎么办？ 发自小木虫手机客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有5人回复
-
今年春晚有几个节目很不错，点赞！
已经有9人回复
-
情人节自我反思：在爱情中有过遗憾吗？
已经有10人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复
-
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有5人回复
steven_198377
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 68 (初中生)
- 金币: 1272.6
- 散金: 4
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 637
- 在线: 185.4小时
- 虫号: 311922
- 注册: 2006-12-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
Reviews Topical, forward-looking, and of general interest to the readership. Length is flexible (6–20 or more pages). A good review critically evaluates existing work of multiple groups in a field or across disciplines, provides a logical organization, and makes the material more easily available to those not expert in the area through clear text and figures. Reviews should lay out the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. Reviews should contain an abstract and appropriate references. The use of graphics to illustrate key concepts is strongly encouraged. Reviews include a graphical Table of Contents entry. Reviews also include ~8–10 keywords and a vocabulary section in which 5–7 terms extracted from the text are defined in one or two sentences. Reviews are generally submitted by invitation only. Review suggestions may be directed to the Editor. Reviews should not contain claims of novelty, as all manuscripts submitted to ACS Nano are expected to contain novel components. Reviews are generally submitted by invitation only. |
2楼2025-09-16 09:09:50