| 查看: 423 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
ACS nano 投稿 已有1人参与
|
发邮件说“Before we proceed, we notice that from the abstract, cover letter the manuscript type is mentioned as 'Review'. However, you have selected 'Article' please update the manuscript type if its a review and resubmit it.”但是type的选项没有这个怎么办？ 发自小木虫手机客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有46人回复
-
回收溶剂求助
已经有7人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有17人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿
已经有22人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
-
求助文献
已经有3人回复
-
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
steven_198377
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 68 (初中生)
- 金币: 1053.6
- 散金: 4
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 635
- 在线: 185.1小时
- 虫号: 311922
- 注册: 2006-12-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
Reviews Topical, forward-looking, and of general interest to the readership. Length is flexible (6–20 or more pages). A good review critically evaluates existing work of multiple groups in a field or across disciplines, provides a logical organization, and makes the material more easily available to those not expert in the area through clear text and figures. Reviews should lay out the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead. Reviews should contain an abstract and appropriate references. The use of graphics to illustrate key concepts is strongly encouraged. Reviews include a graphical Table of Contents entry. Reviews also include ~8–10 keywords and a vocabulary section in which 5–7 terms extracted from the text are defined in one or two sentences. Reviews are generally submitted by invitation only. Review suggestions may be directed to the Editor. Reviews should not contain claims of novelty, as all manuscripts submitted to ACS Nano are expected to contain novel components. Reviews are generally submitted by invitation only. |
2楼2025-09-16 09:09:50