24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 181  |  回复: 2
当前主题已经存档。

Geochimica

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 【转帖】Aftershocks can last for centuries

Why earthquakes might happen in unexpected places.
转载自http://www.nature.com/news/2009/091104/full/news.2009.1062.html
Jane Qiu


Some tremors may be aftershocks of bigger earthquakes that occurred hundreds of years ago, researchers say.

Scientists assess earthquake risks mainly by looking at fault movements and seismic activity along the boundaries of tectonic plates, where most quakes take place. But at the plate interior, "we have little idea where the next fault rupture will happen on the continent and every major quake came as a surprise", says Mian Liu, a geophysicist at the University of Missouri in Columbia, and an author of a study in Nature looking at aftershocks1.

Indeed, the magnitude-7.9 Sichuan earthquake in China in 2008 caught scientists off guard because it occurred in an area that had been experiencing little seismic activity (see 'Seismology: The sleeping dragon').

In contrast, the seismic zone near New Madrid in Missouri has seen frequent earthquakes in recent years but studies using Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements have shown little strain accumulation due to ground motion across the fault2.


Liu and Seth Stein, a geophysicist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, noticed that the frequency and magnitude of these New Madrid quakes had declined since 1811-12, when four earthquakes of magnitude 7–7.5 shook the town.

"These are patterns of aftershocks," says Liu. But aftershocks were thought to be felt for no more than a decade after the initial quake.
fault scarp left by the 1959 magnitude 7.5 Hebgen Lake, Montana earthquake.Fault scarp left by a 1959 magnitude 7.5 earthquake in Montana. Aftershocks of the earthquake continue today.Seth Stein

Stein and Liu, however, suspected that the duration of aftershocks, which take place as the crust around the fault plane adjusts to the effects of the main shock, could be related to the rate at which the fault moves. At fast-moving faults, such as the San Andreas fault, aftershocks would die out quickly.

But with the New Madrid fault, which moves over 100 times more slowly than the San Andreas fault, it could take hundreds of years for the effects of a major earthquake to fade away.

Using a simple model of the changes in fault property after an earthquake, the researchers verified the relationship. Moreover, they found that data from 16 major earthquakes around the world are consistent with their work.

"It is interesting that, with the same seismic history, we can come up with completely opposed predictions of where the next quakes are most likely to occur." says Ross Stein, a geologist at the US Geological Survey in Menlo Park, California, who was not involved with the work. "We may have been fooled by the seismic activity [along the New Madrid fault], assuming that it represents the build-up of the next major earthquake."

Liu stresses, however, that the study has just looked at one aspect of a very complicated problem. "We are just trying to correct the part of the practice that isn't working," he says. "Recent seismic activity can be misleading for assessing earthquake hazards."


Liu says that the study also suggests that seismic models based on studies at plate boundaries may not work for predicting earthquakes in the interior of plates. At the boundaries, tectonic stress builds up at a constant rate, leading to fairly regular cycles of earthquakes. In the interiors, however, such constant stress-loading processes do not occur.

"Predicting big quakes based on small quakes is like the 'whack-a-mole' game: you wait for the mole to come up where it went down," says Seth Stein. "But we now know that big earthquakes can pop up somewhere else."

Indeed, detailed earthquake catalogues in China, which go back more than 2,000 years, show that large earthquakes have never struck in the same place twice. "So the mole never came up from the same hole twice," says Liu.


To further test his hypothesis, Liu is leading a US–China collaboration to study earthquakes in northern China. In the past 700 years, there have been three earthquakes of magnitude 8 or greater — including the Huaxian earthquake in 1556, the most deadly earthquake in human history which killed more than 830,000 people — and a dozen of magnitude 7 or more along the Shanxi graben, a depressed block of land between parallel faults, in Shanxi province.

But the Shanxi graben has been dormant for the past 200 years, whereas the seismic activity seems to be increasing in the North China Plain to its east, resulting in large earthquakes such as the magnitude 7.8 Tangshan earthquake in 1976.

Liu and his colleagues now plan to use seismological methods to map the distribution of fault zones in the region as well as their movements and underlying structure; they will use GPS stations to measure strain accumulation along active faults and dig trenches to establish the history of ancient earthquakes.

"Hopefully, these multiple approaches will be able to test our aftershock hypothesis and advance our understanding of earthquakes," says Liu.


      References
         1. Stein, S. & Liu, M. Nature 462, 87-89 (2009). | Article
         2. Calais, E. & Stein, S. Science 323, 1442 (2009). | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

[ Last edited by Geochimica on 2009-11-8 at 15:06 ]
回复此楼
为什么不让我上传大于128K的GIF图像!!!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
3x,谢谢分享
2楼2009-11-12 15:13:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Geochimica

木虫 (正式写手)

不客气。
为什么不让我上传大于128K的GIF图像!!!
3楼2009-11-13 23:48:20
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 Geochimica 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 青基如何破局 +6 lyz123lyz 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-27 17:31 by 宁静致远sy
[基金申请] 投票:  有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的? +15 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-26 17/850 2026-08-27 17:25 by xxniao123
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +10 eulota 2026-08-26 10/500 2026-08-27 17:23 by lqllinqiaoli
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +3 ssyjh 2026-08-27 3/150 2026-08-27 09:59 by 阿拉贡aragon
[基金申请] 为什么 国际(地区)合作与交流项目 没有放榜? 10+3 majunge000 2026-08-26 11/550 2026-08-27 08:42 by 北京莱茵编辑
[教师之家] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急 +3 LIbGuocjEEYw 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-27 04:33 by Ie9AyIAvGbvs
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 LIbGuocjEEYw 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-27 02:01 by Ie9AyIAvGbvs
[基金申请] 2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战 +7 process2012 2026-08-23 10/500 2026-08-26 19:23 by hmhminy
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +5 huang1991js 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 16:09 by Equinoxhua
[基金申请] 能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项 +23 koalala 2026-08-24 26/1300 2026-08-26 14:29 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 哪位高人中了,把查询到的截图贴出来让我看看,让我长长见识 +4 yuleib84 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-26 13:40 by yuleib84
[基金申请] 为什么国自然不能直接公布 +4 bjdxyxy 2026-08-26 4/200 2026-08-26 13:12 by qingmu1201
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑,不妨来听听这首《基金之外》 +8 scalable 2026-08-24 8/400 2026-08-25 12:52 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 我面上完蛋了 +13 且听虎啸 2026-08-20 14/700 2026-08-25 09:10 by mrkang
[基金申请] 看来今天不会放榜了? +8 chengyan1220 2026-08-21 11/550 2026-08-21 17:52 by dcqxinyang
[基金申请] 基金啊基金 +4 longfie172 2026-08-20 4/200 2026-08-21 08:58 by mark mao
信息提示
请填处理意见