| 查看: 818 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
投什么杂志好呢
|
|||
|
虫友们请给点建议: 1. 刚投了Adv Cat Syn 这个杂志 (08 IF 5.6),20多天后两个审稿人都是拒绝,提的主要意见是 新颖性不够。 2. 他们建议我投 Eur J Org Chem (08 IF 3.0) 3. 投EJOC 我有点心不甘,我觉的我的比09年初的OL (08 IF 5.1)的要好。我可能写的不好,没有把两点强调出来。 我想投J Org Chem (IF 3.96),虫友觉的如何,接收几率多大。再审稿时我要不要把这封审稿信给附上呢?附上是不是降低了接收几率。 4. 据说,Adv Cat Syn 和EJOC 编辑部 在一个楼,所以审稿人推荐同一个杂志,我要是按照审稿人意见投EJOC是不是接收几率很大。 审稿人1的评价: How important do you consider the results reported?: Less Important Does the article contribute to the advancement of efficient and practical synthesis or could it serve as the basis for future developments toward this goal?: Possibly - see comment field Do the data obtained by experiment or calculation verify the hypotheses and conclusions?: Yes Is the length of the manuscript appropriate to its contents?: Yes If you are of the opinion that the contribution is not suitable for publication in Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, please indicate which other journal you consider more appropriate.: EJOC or Synthesis 审稿人2的意见 How important do you consider the results reported?: Less Important Does the article contribute to the advancement of efficient and practical synthesis or could it serve as the basis for future developments toward this goal?: Yes Do the data obtained by experiment or calculation verify the hypotheses and conclusions?: Yes Is the length of the manuscript appropriate to its contents?: Yes If you are of the opinion that the contribution is not suitable for publication in Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, please indicate which other journal you consider more appropriate.: European Journal of Organic Chemistry |
» 猜你喜欢
MSER送审了还被拒稿
已经有4人回复
今年E04面上
已经有21人回复
2026年面上项目中了,2A+B, 会评顺利通过
已经有14人回复
b口会评
已经有5人回复
在职考研
已经有5人回复
大龄残疾硕士的一点执念
已经有22人回复
生命口会评
已经有4人回复
网络举报学术不端成为了男女之间情杀的手段了,真荒唐。。。
已经有3人回复
Suzuki偶联中硼酸酯原料掉下的硼酸酯是否可以自身偶联,生成B2Pin2杂质
已经有3人回复
刑法学论文投稿求助
已经有5人回复
rfxu
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1031
- 帖子: 1017
- 在线: 6.7小时
- 虫号: 809123
- 注册: 2009-07-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子化学与物理,材料化学
7楼2009-11-09 11:50:24











回复此楼