²é¿´: 442  |  »Ø¸´: 4
µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ­´æµµ¡£
µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû

953403005

Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)

[½»Á÷] revised ÒâÒŠÕˆ½Ì

¸÷λÏÈßMºÃ СµÜ×î½üÊÕµ½Œ?¸åÒâÒŠÁË Ò²é_Ê¼ÖøÊֻظ²

È»¶øÆäÖÐÓÐÒ»‚€ÒâÒŠÎÒ²»ÊǺܴ_¶¨ËûµÄÒâ˼ ¿É·ñÕˆ¸÷λÏÈßM½oücÒâÒŠÄØ

ÖxÖx


Please explain what leads to the conclusion of "it can be concluded that the wear volume loss in the two different sliding directions was not influenced by the injection molding conditions" since variation in molding conditions did change the wear volume loss no matter in which sliding direction based on the data shown in your paper.


×£¸£ËùÓÐͶ¸åµÄÈË ÎÄÕ¶¼í˜Àû±»½ÓÊÜ
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

953403005

Òø³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)

ÔٴΙzÒ•ÎÄÕÂáá µÄ´_°l¬FÁËß@‚€†–î} ¸ÐÖx»Ø¸²
5Â¥2009-11-03 15:20:54
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
²é¿´È«²¿ 5 ¸ö»Ø´ð

liuhuachu

ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
¿ÉÄÜÊÇÄãµÄÊý¾ÝÏÔʾ£¬ÎÞÂÛÊÇÄĸö·½Ïò£¬molding conditionȷʵӰÏìÁËwear volumn loss¡£µ«ÊÇÄãÔÚÎÄÖÐȴ˵ûÓÐÓ°Ïì¡£
Òò´Ë£¬Éó¸åÈËÏëÖªµÀ£¬´ÓÄÄÀïµÃ³öµÄ½áÂÛ¡£
ÈÎÆ¾ÊÀ¼ä±ä»Ã£¬ÐÄÖб£³ÖÁ¼ÉÆ£¡
2Â¥2009-11-02 22:23:14
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

zllee77

ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
ÈÏÕæÐ޸ģ¬ÕùÈ¡³É¹¦£¡£¡×£ºÃÔË£¡
3Â¥2009-11-02 22:28:26
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

hello_79

Í­³æ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)

¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
ÎÒµÄÀí½âÊÇÄãʵÑéÊý¾Ý֤ʵÁ˲»ÂÛsliding directionÊÇÔõÑùµÄ£¬ variation in molding conditions ¶¼»áµ¼ÖÂthe wear volume loss ¸Ä±ä£¬µ«ÄãÈ´µÃ³öÁËÕâ¸ö½áÂÛ the wear volume loss in the two different sliding directions ²»»áÊܵ½injection molding conditionsµÄÓ°Ï죬ÕâÁ½ÕßÓгåÍ»£¬
ÆÀÉóÈ˶ÔÕâµã±È½ÏÃÔ»ó
4Â¥2009-11-03 00:23:57
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û