| 查看: 206 | 回复: 2 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
论文修改求助
|
|||
|
我修改了双倍行距和行编码后,投过去,等了四五天吧,又来了个这东西,就说我的文章和他期刊的要求不一致,让我改。我看了他的作者须知,感觉没啥不一样的了。他也不说明哪里不一致,真郁闷,不知道怎么改?谢谢大家,谁知道这是怎么回事? Thank you for submitting your work to XXXXX. Before we pass on manuscripts to the Journal Editor, who is responsible for the scientific assessment, we perform an initial check against formal technical criteria (structure of submission, adherence to the Guide for Authors and English language usage). We regret to inform you that your manuscript does not meet the journal's required standard. Please make changes/corrections as detailed in the comments below. IMPORTANT: WHEN YOU RESUBMIT YOUR MANUSCRIPT, YOU MUST PROVIDE A SEPARATE LIST OF RESPONSES TO THE PROBLEMS THAT WERE RAISED. PLEASE SUBMIT THIS LIST UNDER THE SUBMISSION ITEM "RESPONSES TO TECHNICAL CHECK RESULTS". A sample of the "Responses" sheet can be found at: http://www.elsevierscitech.com/l ... echnical_Check.pdf. Before resubmitting your manuscript, please make sure that every aspect of the manuscript is in accordance with the Guide for Authors which is available at http://ees.elsevier.com/jbb/ top of screen. PLEASE NOTE: Resubmission is not a guarantee that your submission will subsequently proceed to the peer review process, which is a decision to be made at the sole discretion of the journal editor. Yours sincerely, XXXX 难道是让我对以前的修改做一个"Responses" sheet 吗? |
» 猜你喜欢
帮忙看看fileCode
已经有8人回复
小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊
已经有3人回复
FileCode能看出啥?
已经有15人回复
filecode
已经有8人回复
确定了,国自然21号放榜
已经有7人回复
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分?
已经有11人回复
关于代码变化问题,想知道的进来
已经有24人回复
为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果
已经有3人回复
静等基金结果
已经有16人回复
我的国基提前知道中了,可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了,怎么会有这样的人
已经有11人回复
2楼2009-10-30 13:50:07
3楼2009-10-30 14:25:26










回复此楼
100