| 查看: 2013 | 回复: 12 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者wutongboy将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
PRL审稿意见，不知道是拒稿还是修改，重投的希望大吗？已有6人参与
|
||
|
一个月前投了一篇physical review letters，今天两位审稿人返回意见： 一位审稿人意见“I find the text is easy to follow but has some grammatical errors that need fixing. However, I do not recommend publication in PRL for the following major concerns”。 另一位审稿人认为“While the work is innovative and the manuscript engaging, it falls short in its physical interpretation and analysis, which are essential for publication in Physical Review Letters. A deeper investigation into the physical mechanisms behind the observed phenomena is necessary to substantiate the claims.” 最终编辑给出的意见：Based on the information at hand, we judge that your manuscript probably does not meet our criteria of impact, innovation, and interest and is thus not suited for publication in Physical Review Letters. However, if you feel you can overcome the criticism and make a convincing case for publication in PRL, you may resubmit to us. If not, your manuscript may well be suited for one of the topical Physical Review journals, such as Physical Review E or Physical Review Research。 目前论文状态：with authors 请大家帮忙看看，这个状态到底是拒稿还是修改啊？这种状态和意见如果修改后重投，最后接收的概率大吗？ 谢谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
咨询一下，是不是教授之间比较忌讳谈论文造假，因为可能很多人都是造假
已经有7人回复
-
四线城市公办高校无编or二线城市民办高校
已经有30人回复
-
博一
已经有16人回复
-
为啥很多高校老师不愿意当副院长？
已经有10人回复
-
今天是考研的第一天
已经有8人回复
-
Required Reviews Completed
已经有7人回复
-
投稿期刊
已经有7人回复
-
申博的科研计划书怎么写？
已经有10人回复
-
26考研
已经有8人回复
-
sci二区的审稿周期
已经有12人回复
ckck9999
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 59 (初中生)
- 金币: 11020.1
- 散金: 2130
- 红花: 35
- 帖子: 2581
- 在线: 495.8小时
- 虫号: 384055
- 注册: 2007-05-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 物理化学
|
这个其实就是拒稿重投嘛，但是你要付出比较大的代价。充分说服两位审稿人，你的物理方面的机理性研究要非常加深。我建议还是修改后重投，毕竟这么好的杂志不容易。按照这个意见，你重投了肯定还会继续送审。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
3楼2024-09-27 12:56:01
5