| 查看: 1852 | 回复: 3 | |||
vanlinus新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
论文被拒，编辑那边都没通过。 已有2人参与
|
|
第一次投稿，想问问大家 The results show incremental progress both qualitatively speaking (comparing the images to other approaches) and quantitatively speaking (comparing the metrics in the table to other approaches). There is not discernible improvement to your approach. As a result, this work will not be of broad interest to the Optics Express reader base. 最后还让我转投“光学连续体”，我看这个期刊连  中科院分区都没进，不知道学校承不承认这个Optica Publishing Group's journal Optics Continuum considers research articles meeting high standards for technical accuracy, scientific rigor, and quality of presentation without judgment of impact or significance. Learn more at https://opg.optica.org/optcon/home.cfm. If you are interested in transferring your manuscript to Optics Continuum for consideration, please log on to https://prism.optica.org/Author and click the “Author Request Transfer to Optics Continuum” button next to your submission. 想问问大佬们有什么建议 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
科研求助
已经有4人回复
-
博士去二本高校当辅导员，如何调整心态？
已经有11人回复
-
面上有专家说实验设备不是我们单位的
已经有6人回复
-
江苏省自然基金 什么时候出结果
已经有6人回复
-
闲聊
已经有3人回复
-
初秋的晨风
已经有6人回复
2楼2024-09-20 16:24:33
3楼2024-09-20 20:09:37
|
ook 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
4楼2024-09-20 23:19:42