| 查看: 919 | 回复: 20 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一篇文章审稿回来让大修，请大虫看看接受的机会大不大
|
|||
|
主编给的结果是major revision.信中这样写到： We have received the reports from our advisors on your article, "++++", which you submitted to "Water Resources Management". Based on the advice received, I feel that your article could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. When preparing your revised article, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which can be found below, and submit a list of responses to the comments. 主编用了reconsidered for publication，让我觉得希望好像很渺茫。 请教有经验的大虫们给点意见。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
谈谈两天一夜的“延安行”
已经有6人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有12人回复
-
氨基封端PDMS和HDI反应快速固化
已经有11人回复
-
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有11人回复
-
论文投稿求助
已经有4人回复
-
Applied Surface Science 这个期刊。有哪位虫友投过的能把word模板发给我参考一下嘛
已经有3人回复
-
投稿精细化工
已经有6人回复
14楼2009-10-26 16:28:34
2楼2009-10-26 12:37:02
3楼2009-10-26 12:42:21
xiu_chem
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 5648.4
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 988
- 在线: 266.7小时
- 虫号: 297483
- 注册: 2006-11-18
- 专业: 资源化工
4楼2009-10-26 12:46:49