24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 963  |  回复: 4

浮生如茶123

新虫 (小有名气)

[交流] Energy期刊投稿 已有2人参与

三月初投的energy,5月5号给的审稿意见,我人麻了,这算大修还是小修啊,按照他的意见改完了,返修回去十多天了没动静啊
Reviewers’ comments on the manuscript:

Reviewer #1: The author discussed the Transient characterization of the mode switching process in the reversible solid oxide cell stack may include the following suggestion
1.The author may rewrite the Result and discussion part for better understanding
2.What is the possible time for Mode switch from SOFC to SOEC mode?
3.May include the what are the reaction takes place involved inside the chamber
4.What will be the reversible efficiency?




Reviewer #2: Transient characterization of the mode switching process in the reversible solid oxide cell stack

This study offers a comprehensive examination of the influence of various physical processes on the transient characteristics of SOFC. The simulation models are clear and all results are well explained. Nice work to the authors. Few minor points that might worth considerations:

1. Please check and add missing legend/axis labels and captions on all figures, it is hard to go back and forth to find what is shown in each figure.
2. The reaction rates are affected by mass transfer, one thing that can be easily checked is whether increase in back pressure will improve mass transfer and lower the transition lags. This could be a nice addition to existing work or reserved for future work.
3. Mass transfer lags often cause reaction starvation, which could cause overpotentials in electrochemical reactions and accelerate degradation. A short discussion on this would be helpful.
4. Large of the thermal lags are caused by the planar layouts of the stack as mentioned by the authors, there are better layouts like tubular or tubular/planar hybrids. It will be interesting to see how other layouts affect the simulation results. However, for the present layout, how would changing inlet gas temperature affect the thermal lag?

发自小木虫Android客户端
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

RRRKKK

至尊木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
这种意见太好修改了吧,无需纠结大小修。
电控
2楼2024-06-02 11:29:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

投必得科研顾问

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)

投必得学术



小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
一般编辑退修的时候会给一个明确的回复,不过如果没给的话,就先按照审稿人的意见去修改,一般没有大的原则性问题就是小修。其实,大修和小修不是根本问题,最根本的是作者是否有认真修改,如果修改的好,就离接收近了一步,反之,即使是小修,而作者也没有认真修改的话,也或许就与发表失之交臂了。祝好运!
3楼2024-06-02 22:53:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

浮生如茶123

新虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by lucky_my2010 at 2024-06-02 11:29:30
这种意见太好修改了吧,无需纠结大小修。

第一个审稿人那个需要重写结果和讨论部分,给我整的不会了

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2024-06-06 13:38:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

RRRKKK

至尊木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 浮生如茶123 at 2024-06-06 13:38:53
第一个审稿人那个需要重写结果和讨论部分,给我整的不会了
...

再加强描述即可,完全没问题的
电控
5楼2024-06-06 13:41:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 浮生如茶123 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见