| 查看: 640 | 回复: 1 | |||
[交流]
PNAS投稿求助
|
|
最近投稿了一篇PNAS，内容是模式植物植物杂种优势的研究，个人觉得很有创新性。 被Editorial Board拒稿了 给的理由是The submission is better suited for a specialty journal. 换投plant cell，编辑还有那个PNAS编辑，请问他是认可还是不认可呀，还要他做编辑吗？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。
已经有9人回复
-
有时候真觉得大城市人没有县城人甚至个体户幸福
已经有11人回复
-
表哥与省会女结婚，父母去帮带孩子被省会女气回家生重病了
已经有7人回复
-
同年申请2项不同项目，第1个项目里不写第2个项目的信息，可以吗
已经有8人回复
-
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。
已经有10人回复
-
天津大学招2026.09的博士生，欢迎大家推荐交流（博导是本人）
已经有9人回复
-
有院领导为了换新车，用横向课题经费买了俩车
已经有10人回复
-
AI 太可怕了，写基金时，提出想法，直接生成的文字比自己想得深远，还有科学性
已经有6人回复
|
PNAS is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to publish high-impact research of general interest to the scientific community. Because we receive more than 18,000 submissions every year, incoming manuscripts undergo an initial evaluation by a member of the Editorial Board, who is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences, to determine whether the potential novelty, impact, and relevance in the broad scientific community merit further detailed technical review. In your case, our assessment is that your manuscript does not meet one or more of the principal aims of our journal and on this basis we expect that the likelihood that detailed review will lead to publication is low. This decision is necessarily subjective and does not reflect an evaluation of the technical quality of your work or of its appropriateness for a more specialized audience. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2024-05-26 23:12:39