24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1133  |  回复: 7
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

stonezhoujun

金虫 (著名写手)

[交流] JAP 求助

这是编辑的意见:
Your manuscript, referenced below, has been reviewed for publication in the Journal of Applied Physics. It has been found to be of potential interest。However, the reviewer recommends major revisions.
这是审稿人的意见:
To my greatest disappointment, the identity of subject material was poorly characterized since I do not see any evidence for the formation o f*** solid solution, nor was the evidence for the structural features (structure, cation coordination, the nature of solid solution) of XXX (which are critical for rationalization of XXX properties) presented in this research. Without knowing the nature of XXX solid solution, any attempted interpretation of the authors' observations is futile. SEM micrographs do not prove the identity of  XXX formation.

The manuscript is not acceptable for publication in the present form. The authors are urged to respond to the following comments and make a major mandatory revision.

大修后还有接收的希望吗? 我感觉审稿人的意见太尖锐了!请各位帮忙看看!谢谢!
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 stonezhoujun 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见