24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 356  |  回复: 3
当前主题已经存档。

psyuan

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 审稿人的意见,应该怎样修改?

我原文的一句话:
In conclusion, we provide here the first evidence for the therapeutic value of amiloride by blocking ASICs in rheumatoid arthritis. Investigation of the articular cartilage at the molecular level has resulted in a new understanding of the processes involved in the destruction and remodeling of cartilage in diseased joints.

审稿人的一句话:
it is not correct to state that this is evidence of a therapeutic value of amiloride by blocking ASICs in rheumatoid arthritis. As stated above the authors are not studying the disease process of rheumatoid arthritis, but the response to adjuvant-induced arthritis which is being taken as a model of rheumatoid arthritis. The authors might wish to comment briefly on the suitability of this model for studying the process of rheumatoid arthritis. Similarly it is not appropriate to consider these 'diseased' joints

各位战友在原文中如何修改呢?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zxyan

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
"the response to adjuvant-induced arthritis which is being taken as a model of rheumatoid arthritis. " maybe, is not appropriate to "we provide here the first evidence for the therapeutic value of amiloride by blocking ASICs in rheumatoid arthritis" for you have not investigated the disease process of it. (experimental data?!) good luck!
2楼2009-10-16 17:05:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hbqouc

木虫 (知名作家)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
按审稿人的意见修改 我们的目的就是发文章
be somebody or nobody, the choice is yours
3楼2009-10-16 17:17:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wuss2005

木虫 (著名写手)

我们的目的就是发文章 ,按审稿人的意见修改
4楼2009-10-16 18:39:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 psyuan 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见