| ²é¿´: 1217 | »Ø¸´: 28 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
shiqiansansiͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÆÀÂÛÈç´Ë£¬Ï£Íû´óÂð£¿
|
||
| Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject the manuscript as is but I encourage you to resubmit the manuscript. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì281»¹Óе÷¼Á»ú»áÂð
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ïôó0856£¬306Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
271Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
ɽ¶«¸ßУ½Ìʦ¿¼ºË³¬¼¶ÎÞµ×Ïߣ¬Ô±¹¤¹ý²»ÏÂÈ¥À²
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÓÐûÓÐѧУ²ÄÁÏרҵÊÕ¿çµ÷(Ò»Ö¾Ô¸085410)
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
280Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
344 ²ÄÁÏרҵ Çóµ÷¼Á211 ÎÞµØÓòÒªÇó
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
290Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
0854µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
zhaomg
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 650.8
- É¢½ð: 202
- Ìû×Ó: 808
- ÔÚÏß: 37.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 600013
- ×¢²á: 2008-09-12
- רҵ: Á£×ÓÎïÀíѧºÍ³¡ÂÛ

19Â¥2009-10-13 17:46:02
jhuiuc
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.03
- ½ð±Ò: 11259.7
- ºì»¨: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 556
- ÔÚÏß: 917.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 802252
- ×¢²á: 2009-07-02
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÏà¹Ø½»²æÁìÓò
2Â¥2009-10-13 13:27:35
hupeng1118
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 65.4
- É¢½ð: 132
- Ìû×Ó: 316
- ÔÚÏß: 114.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 843619
- ×¢²á: 2009-09-08
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¼ÆËãÊýѧÓë¿ÆÑ§¹¤³Ì¼ÆËã
3Â¥2009-10-13 13:30:33
shiqiansansi
ͳæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 175.5
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 89
- ÔÚÏß: 17.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 388242
- ×¢²á: 2007-05-31
- רҵ: Ñø²Ïѧ
|
ÎÒµÚÒ»´ÎͶSCIÎÄÕ£¬¸øÕâô¸ö½á¹û£¬ÕæÓôÃÆ¡£²»¹ýÒ»Éóר¼Ò»ù±¾Ã»ÓÐÌáʲôÎÊÌ⣬¶þÉóר¼ÒÌáÁËÁ½µã¡£ Reviewer #2: In order to save your precious time, after a rapid scan of this paper, if you think this paper's English writing: ( ) Excellent ( ) Good ( ) Moderate ( x ) Poor ( ) Erroneous Does this work have scientific significance and innovation? ( x ) Yes ( ) No Is the paper worth publishing in JZUS according to the international journal standards? ( x ) Yes ( ) No ÕâÖÖÇé¿öÏ£¬ÊDz»ÊDZ»¾ÜÁ˰¡£¡£¿ |
4Â¥2009-10-13 13:38:15













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥