| 查看: 756 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
经验大佬们帮忙看看 已有2人参与
|
|||
|
Reviewer #1: Overall concept: the quality of the manuscript is remarkably unsatisfactory. Also, the topic addressed is outside the expertise of the CONBUILDMAT journal. Therefore, the reviewer suggests the rejection of the manuscript. Reviewer #2: CONBUILDMAT-D-23-09891 This manuscript presents an interesting study on developing and optimizing a novel microbial dust suppressant for limestone mine dust control. The authors systematically optimized the composition of the dust suppressant using response surface methodology and evaluated its physical, chemical, and dust suppression properties. Overall, the research is well-designed and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the formulated dust suppressant. However, for the manuscript to become publishable and useful to the academic and professional communities, the authors must make significant revisions and carefully consider the comments received. More discussion comparing this approach to other existing microbial dust suppression methods would strengthen the work. Additionally, some comments and suggestions are provided on specific sections to further improve the clarity, accuracy, and depth of the manuscript. The attached comments aim to provide constructive feedback for the authors to enhance the clarity, depth, and overall quality of the manuscript. Reviewer #3: The research content is intriguing, and the development of dust suppressants aligns with the requirements of sustainable development. However, there are several key issues that hinder the quality of the manuscript. Reviewer #4: What does the mass loss rate under simulated rain reveal about the effectiveness of dust suppressants in retaining solidified dust and preventing it from being washed away by rainfall? Reviewer #6: This paper explores a novel microbial dust suppressant suitable for cleaning limestone production. It not only expands the application scenarios for microorganisms but also provides an effective approach to address the dust emission issue in limestone powder production. The study demonstrates novelty, thorough data collection, a feasible research approach, and systematic testing. The research findings hold theoretical significance and practical value for engineering applications. I recommend publishing this study in Construction & Building Materials journal. However, there are some suggestions for further revisions or clarifications: Reviewer #7: Summary In this paper, the physical and chemical properties of the new dust suppressant were analyzed, and indexes related to its dust suppression efficiency were evaluated, including the wind and rain resistance, moisture retention, and appearance of the solidified surface layer. This paper is in a good shape after addresses these comments. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
329求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
材料求调剂一志愿哈工大324
已经有8人回复
-
286求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
083000学硕274求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
311求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
一志愿C9材料与化工专业总分300求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
311求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
291求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿厦门大学化学学硕307求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
286求调剂
已经有10人回复
6楼2023-11-05 08:58:44
2楼2023-11-05 08:34:23
半生梦君
新虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2802.8
- 散金: 246
- 沙发: 112
- 帖子: 3513
- 在线: 640.1小时
- 虫号: 33637970
- 注册: 2023-04-23
- 专业: 泛函分析
3楼2023-11-05 08:37:28
4楼2023-11-05 08:42:59
5