24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3546)
>考博 (362)
>导师招生 (250)
>硕博家园 (202)
>招聘信息布告栏 (121)
>虫友互识 (49)
>文献求助 (40)
>学术会议 (38)
>考研 (28)
>休闲灌水 (27)
>论文投稿 (15)
>博后之家 (12)
>基金申请 (9)
>教师之家 (8)
>找工作 (8)
>公派出国 (8)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

443933501

新虫 (著名写手)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 364.5
散金: 3600
帖子: 1313
在线: 259.3小时
虫号: 32445096
注册: 2023-01-03
专业: 宗教学理论

[交流] IJoF这样的major revisions，好好改是不是希望比较大？已有2人参与

编辑整体意见：The reviewers have recommended that the paper be published only if major revisions are made. ?If you decide to make corrections in compliance with the reviewers' comments please submit the revised version within Oct XX, 2023 days to expedite the publication of your article.
?Reviewer 1 ：对方法的认可，还有Regarding the methodology, I do not have any significant comment, but the form needs major improvements. In the present form it is difficult to follow and understand the presented results and discussion.
?每条意见主要一个是图一些坐标拼写错误，另一个是公式对应性问题，还有参数跟结果表格对应性。
?reviewer 2：也是对方法认可，还有I believe it is a good article and has the potential to be published in the 期刊名. However, it is necessary to make the following corrections:
每条意见主要一个是?一些低级拼写错误和表述不正确，另一个是两个专业性解释的问题，还有就是要引言两篇参考文献（应该是他本人的）。

整体感觉两位专家很懂，提的问题确实有助于提高论文可读性，哪怕最后结果悲剧再换投质量也是有所提升。

发自小木虫Android客户端

回复此楼