24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

shifengyu

应助: (幼儿园)
在线:
虫号: 544991

[交流] 为何一篇SCI论文被两个期刊编辑分别直接拒稿?

我是个新手,写了一篇英文SCI文章, 两次直接被SCI期刊(IF>2)的编辑锯掉,非常郁闷. 文章似乎没有价值再修改投稿了? 被编辑贬得一文不值了。
请各位虫友给点建议.
第一次投稿后,被编辑锯掉:
第一次编辑回信:
Dear ** *,
Having gone through this paper I am of the opinion that it is a very minor extension of your earlier paper (**) that was recently accepted by this Journal. This paper merely considers sub-freezing conditions and slightly different storage periods. This is not adequately different and I am therefore rejecting the paper.
Please note that that our journal does not accept progress reports that attempt to generate multiple manuscripts on the same theme. The work must be novel with sufficient evidence of advancing the field of food engineering to justify further review.
I am sorry to disappoint you. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.
Yours sincerely,
** **
Editor Journal of **.

第二次编辑回信:
Dear ** *,
I regret to inform you that the content of your paper is not appropriate for publication in ***. The research reported in this paper is relevant and of interest to industry. The work was carried out in a competent fashion and is technically sound. However, the work is of limited general interest and is lacking in scientific depth and novelty to warrant publication in **. This decision is based on our editorial policy to publish more fundamental work of a general nature.
I understand that this decision may be frustrating since I know how long it takes to prepare a manuscript in a particular journal format. However, I invite you and members of your group to submit mechanistic papers with a strong quantitative emphasis for consideration for publication in**in the future.
Sincerely,
**
Editor in Chief **.

谢谢！

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

限项规定已经有6人回复
西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生（考核制）—机械、材料、力学方向已经有3人回复
救命帖已经有6人回复
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗已经有37人回复
英文综述是否需要润色及查重已经有5人回复
为什么nbs上溴没有产物点出现呢已经有9人回复
招博士已经有3人回复
最失望的一年已经有18人回复

1楼 2009-10-06 11:04:20

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

jingminl

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 9 (幼儿园)
金币: 6419
散金: 13
红花: 2
帖子: 2162
在线: 435.9小时
虫号: 456753
注册: 2007-11-12
专业: 生物电磁技术

★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流

编辑说的很清楚，你写的内容已经在这个期刊上的另一篇文章里发表了。你再投这个期刊自然不能被录用。
但是，这却反应出你做的东西是比较有意义的。你应该将那篇文章找出来，对照那篇文章将你的文章改成创新点与其有一定差别的文章，再改投其他期刊，录用的可能还是很大的。
另外，从编辑的意思来看，你这篇文章写的实在不怎么样，论文内容没组织好，结果和讨论部分内容不够丰富。特别是摘要和introduction一定没写好（因为编辑说“limited general interest and is lacking in scientific depth and novelty ”，这一般是看完摘要或introduction给出的结论。）