24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

luaixia

木虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 3092
帖子: 134
在线: 104.1小时
虫号: 396430
注册: 2007-06-08
性别: MM
专业: 凝聚态物性I:结构、力学和

[交流] JAP审稿意见总体评价是Marginal ，要求Major Revision，接收机会大吗？

journal of applied physics审稿意见
Reviewer Comments:
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
RECOMMENDATION: Major Revision
Sufficient New Physics in an Applied Area: No
Appropriate Length: Yes
Well Organized and Clearly Written: No
Good Title: No
Good Abstract: Yes
Clear Figures: No
Adequate References: Yes
TECHNICAL QUALITY RATING: Marginal
PRESENTATION RATING: Marginal

The experimental results shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 are clear. However, the manuscript lacks of necessary discussions about the underlying physics as well as comparisons to other SERS techniques. I do not recommend to publish it on Journal of Applied Physics until the authors make the satisfactory revisions according to the following comments.
后面还有很多条审稿意见，看得头晕，主要是觉得我的理论解释不够，还有质疑一些实验数据，缺少与其他相关工作的对比等等。与其他人的相关工作对比这点还是好改的，至于前两条就真的难倒我了，我做的内容目前理论解释本来就不完善，我看了很多文献，也都是提几条模模糊糊的可能的原因。还有实验方面的意见，有些我现在的实验条件做不到，这样怎么答复审稿人啊？
向我这种要求大修，我又不能完全做到的情况要怎样答复审稿人才能有机会接收啊？我研三了，就等着这篇文章接收了好顺利毕业呢！跪求！！！

[ Last edited by SHY31 on 2009-9-18 at 13:48 ]

回复此楼