| 查看: 106 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
修回意见求助
|
|||
|
各位虫友： 本人有一篇大修，一个意见如下： The unrestrained use of P values in this retrospective study is unacceptable. If you wish to quote P values, outside the multivariable analysis, then please make formal statistical adjustments for multiple comparisons. 本人不太明白编辑的意思，请前辈不吝赐教！ 稿约上关于统计其中一段是 Appreciate that statistical significance tests show whether or not an effect could be due to chance and do not indicate the biological or clinical importance of any observed differences. Comment on the magnitude of the chief differences between the groups. Declare the level of statistical significance (usually P < 0.05) and state whether this refers to a one- or two-sided probability. Report the value of the test statistic and the P value. Make allowances for multiple comparisons by adjusting the P value. Generally, though within reason, report confidence intervals as well as P values. 谢谢！！！ [ Last edited by zm2008hrb on 2009-9-18 at 08:37 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
生命口会评
已经有7人回复
-
今年E04面上
已经有23人回复
-
27届辽宁大学应届毕业生申博
已经有3人回复
-
关于如何从代码看上不上会
已经有23人回复
-
大龄残疾硕士的一点执念
已经有25人回复
-
chemdraw
已经有6人回复
-
祈祷青基必中
已经有10人回复
-
b口会评
已经有6人回复
-
信息学部会评时间
已经有3人回复
-
在职考研
已经有7人回复
