| 查看: 83 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
修回意见求助
|
|||
|
各位虫友： 本人有一篇大修，一个意见如下： The unrestrained use of P values in this retrospective study is unacceptable. If you wish to quote P values, outside the multivariable analysis, then please make formal statistical adjustments for multiple comparisons. 本人不太明白编辑的意思，请前辈不吝赐教！ 稿约上关于统计其中一段是 Appreciate that statistical significance tests show whether or not an effect could be due to chance and do not indicate the biological or clinical importance of any observed differences. Comment on the magnitude of the chief differences between the groups. Declare the level of statistical significance (usually P < 0.05) and state whether this refers to a one- or two-sided probability. Report the value of the test statistic and the P value. Make allowances for multiple comparisons by adjusting the P value. Generally, though within reason, report confidence intervals as well as P values. 谢谢！！！ [ Last edited by zm2008hrb on 2009-9-18 at 08:37 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
申请26博士
已经有4人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有21人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有15人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿
已经有20人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
-
聘U V热熔胶研究人员
已经有10人回复
-
求助文献
已经有3人回复
-
投稿返修后收到这样的回复，还有希望吗
已经有8人回复
-
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
