| 查看: 89 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
[交流]
修回意见求助
|
|||
|
各位虫友： 本人有一篇大修，一个意见如下： The unrestrained use of P values in this retrospective study is unacceptable. If you wish to quote P values, outside the multivariable analysis, then please make formal statistical adjustments for multiple comparisons. 本人不太明白编辑的意思，请前辈不吝赐教！ 稿约上关于统计其中一段是 Appreciate that statistical significance tests show whether or not an effect could be due to chance and do not indicate the biological or clinical importance of any observed differences. Comment on the magnitude of the chief differences between the groups. Declare the level of statistical significance (usually P < 0.05) and state whether this refers to a one- or two-sided probability. Report the value of the test statistic and the P value. Make allowances for multiple comparisons by adjusting the P value. Generally, though within reason, report confidence intervals as well as P values. 谢谢！！！ [ Last edited by zm2008hrb on 2009-9-18 at 08:37 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
博士自荐
已经有6人回复
-
博士推荐
已经有4人回复
-
求环氧树脂研发1名
已经有10人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
什么是人一生最重要的？
已经有10人回复
-
面上可以超过30页吧？
已经有13人回复
-
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有13人回复
-
版面费该交吗
已经有17人回复
-
【博士招生】太原理工大学2026化工博士
已经有8人回复
