| 查看: 3853 | 回复: 19 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
这样的不负责任的审稿人是真的存在的吗？？？已有16人参与
|
|||
|
非常生气以及不高兴的投稿经历 投的JCP 其中一个审稿人这么说 Reviewer #2: The work is an average and routine type and cannot be accepted due to the following reasons. 1. This a routine type of work without any originality. 2. English is poor throughout the manuscript. 3. Quantitative information is not provided in the abstract. 4. The concussion is not concise and to the points indicating the application of the work. 5. The novelty of the work is not established. 6. The application and importance of work are not described. 7. Refs are not updated. It should be published as University/Institute technical report. Decision: Rejected. 如果大家都这么说我认了 但是 另一个审稿人这么说 Reviewer #1: This work is new and well written. The study is very important in the field of environmental study. All advanced oxidation parameters have been extensively studied and examined. The polymerization of the target pollutant was demonstrated by the study. Just a minor comment: （剩余内容涉及论文内容不便于放出来） 看完火气直接上来 最后给拒稿了 很无语很难过的一次经历 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
投稿精细化工
已经有6人回复
-
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有36人回复
-
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有10人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有9人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有8人回复
-
读博
已经有5人回复
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
2楼2022-10-06 19:59:55