| 查看: 1071 | 回复: 4 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者genhaolss将赠送您 5 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
大佬们,求助一个审稿人的问题 已有2人参与
|
|||
我收到两个审稿人的意见,一个回复得很中肯,意见也提得很好,但另一个审稿人意见提得较少,感觉看得不是特别仔细,而且认为我的工作没有太多的创新点 ,大佬们认为我修改后需要换掉第二个审稿人吗?附第二个审稿人意见:Comments: The paper needs improvement on technical grounds. Additional Questions: 1) Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Not really. It only proposed marginally improved work. 2) Is the paper technically sound?: To some extent. Please elaborate on SMO within the text. The equations need to be defined first starting from the lowest to the highest level of understanding. In this context, the frequency domain utilizing MCVLMCF needs to be defined at Eq No. 15. The Algorithms 1 pseudocode can be written more formally rather than just detailed methodology explained. There is a need for comparative analysis mentioned in Table No. 9 on Datasets COIL100. The contextual features for overcoming need to be formulated first then the actual comparison is declared. 3) Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes to some extent. I am more interested to know the complexity of proposed algorithms with a number of proposed ones. Without this, its is always very difficult to judge the supremacy of the presented results. Furthermore, there is a need to use the ANOVA test for the comparison that provides statistical inference. 4) Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes 5) Are there references that are not appropriate for the topic being discussed?: No 5a) If yes, then please indicate which references should be removed.: |
» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有63人回复
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有23人回复
filecode=后面第一个是大写字母
已经有7人回复
有时候,自然基金真的不能太认真 (我的申报经验)
已经有10人回复
filecode
已经有12人回复
小木虫上这么多卖论文的,真有人买论文么?感觉没必要啊
已经有13人回复
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜?
已经有7人回复
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有13人回复
各位道友,我要去昆明玩几天,回来见。
已经有8人回复
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有22人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-

专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
5楼2022-10-02 14:19:22
风筝不想飞呀
木虫之王 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 651 (博士)
- 金币: 70731.8
- 红花: 188
- 沙发: 59
- 帖子: 13610
- 在线: 742.2小时
- 虫号: 7065795
- 注册: 2017-08-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电磁场与波

2楼2022-10-02 11:13:16
weiyang
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1553.4
- 散金: 5137
- 帖子: 1650
- 在线: 51.9小时
- 虫号: 27938595
- 注册: 2021-12-12
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属基复合材料
3楼2022-10-02 11:55:23










,大佬们认为我修改后需要换掉第二个审稿人吗?附第二个审稿人意见:
回复此楼