版块导航: 正在加载中...

登录注册

应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 llyzxmc 的 35 个金币，回帖就立即获得 1 个金币，每人有 1 次机会

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

llyzxmc

金虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 89.5
帖子: 138
在线: 17.7小时
虫号: 4198225

[交流] PRL physical review letters 投稿求助

还有申诉的必要吗？

一个审稿人说： in its current form this manuscript is clearly
not appropriate for prl.
另一个说：the work is interesting and the manuscript is well-written. however, i
am not convinced that the work is of a significant impact. I
recommend to submit the manuscript to a more specialized journal.
编辑说：
this manuscript has been reviewed by our referees. a critique from the
reports appears below. based on this we judge that the work probably
warrants publication in some form, but does not meet the physical
review letters criteria of impact, innovation, and interest.

the paper, with revision as appropriate, might be suitable for
publication in one of the topical physical review journals or physical
review research. the editors of that journal will make the decision on
publication, and may seek further review. however, our complete file
is available.

in choosing the journal, please be aware that physical review research
is a fully open access publication and, thus, article publication
charges would apply.

if you transfer this manuscript, be sure to include the usual response
to all referee comments and a summary of revisions made.

[ Last edited by llyzxmc on 2022-9-13 at 15:15 ]

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘贴专辑推荐

Phys Rev Lett

» 猜你喜欢

国自然青年基金，1A4B能上会吗？青年和面上的上会标准是一样的吗？已经有24人回复
难道我真的要放弃吗？已经有34人回复
复旦夏同学提出高校成年人学生退学不应该让家长审核，大家认同吗？已经有12人回复
演员杨幂在核心期刊发表论文，中国广播电视学期刊已经有3人回复
回家两天，不想呆了已经有3人回复
江苏省333人才工程出校后被刷的概率大不大？已经有6人回复
三颈瓶加热已经有3人回复
高温酯化反应喷料已经有5人回复
有没有今年的影响因子？已经有6人回复
江南大学到瑞士招聘，称取消非升即走，改预聘+长聘已经有29人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
查看全部散金贴

1楼2022-09-13 14:14:43

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

chenhuanlong

新虫 (文学泰斗)

应助: 12 (小学生)
金币: 145464
帖子: 121596
在线: 4900.7小时
虫号: 2738480

★
llyzxmc(金币+1): 谢谢参与

yeah

发自小木虫Android客户端