| 查看: 738 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
一审回复 ijepes
|
|
电气继电保护方向，今年6月投稿ijepes，9月份收到回复，但是只有一个审稿人，这是什么情况，一下是意见，请xdjm们看一下，第三条意见是啥意思 The proposed method provides an inspiring guide to the practical implementations. Overall, this paper is an interesting and high-quality work. For further clarifying the stated contributions and enhancing the readability of this paper, the following concerns and suggestions need to be carefully addressed, including: 1) The literature review is not that sufficient, resulting in that the motivation of this work is not well stated. 2) The listed main contributions could be more detailed for better describing the proposed protection scheme and clarifying their main contributions; 3) The theoretical proofs are lacking regarding the scalability of the proposed method. More theoretical demonstrations would make the proposed method more convincing. The settings of the used test systems could be presented for convincing the repeatability of this work. More discussions in the case study part could be added for better clarifying the repeatability and scalability of this work; 4) The authors are suggested to go through the entire manuscript to fix grammatical errors, typos, and format issues, e.g., the equation numbers, blurred figures. Especially, the format of the reference should be unified and follow the IJEPES journal template. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
368化学求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
286求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
0703化学求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料调剂
已经有13人回复
-
285求调剂
已经有18人回复
-
机械工程313分找工科调剂
已经有3人回复
-
考研调剂-材料类-284
已经有9人回复
-
一志愿厦大生物学332求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
本科211，293分请求调剂
已经有13人回复
