| 查看: 719 | 回复: 0 | |||
[交流]
一审回复 ijepes
|
|
电气继电保护方向，今年6月投稿ijepes，9月份收到回复，但是只有一个审稿人，这是什么情况，一下是意见，请xdjm们看一下，第三条意见是啥意思 The proposed method provides an inspiring guide to the practical implementations. Overall, this paper is an interesting and high-quality work. For further clarifying the stated contributions and enhancing the readability of this paper, the following concerns and suggestions need to be carefully addressed, including: 1) The literature review is not that sufficient, resulting in that the motivation of this work is not well stated. 2) The listed main contributions could be more detailed for better describing the proposed protection scheme and clarifying their main contributions; 3) The theoretical proofs are lacking regarding the scalability of the proposed method. More theoretical demonstrations would make the proposed method more convincing. The settings of the used test systems could be presented for convincing the repeatability of this work. More discussions in the case study part could be added for better clarifying the repeatability and scalability of this work; 4) The authors are suggested to go through the entire manuscript to fix grammatical errors, typos, and format issues, e.g., the equation numbers, blurred figures. Especially, the format of the reference should be unified and follow the IJEPES journal template. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
过年走亲戚时感受到了所开私家车的鄙视链
已经有10人回复
-
今年春晚有几个节目很不错，点赞！
已经有12人回复
-
情人节自我反思：在爱情中有过遗憾吗？
已经有13人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有12人回复
-
基金正文30页指的是报告正文还是整个申请书
已经有5人回复