| 查看: 2296 | 回复: 13 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者孙洪欣欣将赠送您 5 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
有投过Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety的小伙伴们嘛？让改一些格式重新投？ 已有2人参与
|
||
| 有投过Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety的小伙伴们嘛？一周编辑回复改一些相应的格式啥的，说可以选择重新投。大家有有这种情况的嘛？都重新投了嘛？结果咋样了？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
化工284求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4
已经有5人回复
-
A区一本交叉课题组，低分调剂，招收机械电子信息通信等交叉方向
已经有50人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4
已经有3人回复
-
欢迎211本科同学，过A区国家线，A区非偏远一本，交叉学科课题组
已经有32人回复
-
售渎SCI文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4
已经有6人回复
-
2026调剂】考试A区0703化学类323分 诚求接收
已经有4人回复
-
售渎SCI文章，我:8⊙ 55 1⊙ 54。备注【⊙=0】
已经有5人回复
4楼2022-07-29 22:27:32
EmmaaaXie
铁虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 427.4
- 散金: 100
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 290
- 在线: 34.8小时
- 虫号: 21198965
- 注册: 2020-02-24
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 有机合成
2楼2022-07-29 22:20:56
|
以下是意见：除了格式还有说论文比较臃肿。大家看看还有戏嘛 I have examined your paper and some clarification are needed on the presentation in order to understand the science before it can be reviewed. The manuscript is not very concise and could be shortened. Please check the legends on the figures and/or tables for completeness, such as if values are means, SD or SE, n = replicates, and also the details and explanations of any statistical labels. There can be six illustrations in the main paper and six in the supplement, so please decide what is most important to show. Please draw routine figures in black and white, use colour only where necessary for heat maps, histology, complex diagrams, etc. Place figures and tables at the end of the manuscript, not embedded in the main text. Please be selective but representative with referencing and with no more than 40-45 citations for a regular paper. Please amend and return a clean copy of the manuscript for peer review. Yours sincerely, |
3楼2022-07-29 22:25:12
|
这是邮件的拒稿通知： After careful review by the editors and experts in the field, we regret to inform you that we are unable to accept your manuscript for publication in Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. The comments of the reviewers are included below in order for you to understand the basis for our decision. The editor has noted that the paper is not without its worth, and would like to encourage you to improve your work in accordance with the reviewers' remarks. In the future, the paper (written anew) may be resubmitted and evaluated as a new contribution. In this case, the revised manuscript would be considered a new submission and would be given a new manuscript number with a new date of receipt. Thank you for considering Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, and we hope that you would continue to submit your work to this journal in the future. Sincerely, |
5楼2022-07-29 22:28:59
5