| 查看: 319 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
maad木虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
帮忙看一个审稿意见，谢谢（5个金币求助）
|
||
|
这是大修回来的意见： While the authors have done a reasonable job in terms of correcting obvious mistakes in their previous manuscript, I still cannot see that this manuscript adds nothing new. The conclusions are not backed by the simulation data. Admittedly, the conclusion that Y is a more dominant determinant than T is most likely true, yet, it's unwarranted by the authors data, which contrasts related studies of independent groups. Unfortunately, the analysis presented by the authors is not put in the appropriate perspective given these closely related studies. The authors should also read the literature more carefully, e.g., there are plenty of publications that ......, moreover, a number of references are misquoted, and some are not quoted appropriately. 1、主要疑问是这句： which contrasts related studies of independent groups 是说我们的工作仅仅对比了独立几组，还是我们引用文献的时候只对比了独立的几组文献，还是别的什么意思？ 2、The analysis presented by the authors is not put in the appropriate perspective given these closely related studies. 也不太明白啥意思 3、这段话的意思是不是就是说我们的结果跟别人的对比不够，导致讨论的不充分，不能支持结论？还是有别的隐含意思？ [ Last edited by maad on 2009-9-11 at 10:42 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
听说今天filecode变了
已经有34人回复
-
基金中了
已经有6人回复
-
filecode
已经有14人回复
-
固定端突然变了，今天
已经有7人回复
-
filecode
已经有11人回复
-
大家散了吧，后缀研究没有意义，别浪费时间了，过好目前的每一天，不要焦虑
已经有6人回复
-
一个有机合成实验室都需要哪些设备？
已经有12人回复
-
求各位大神看下
已经有33人回复
-
咨询面上基金
已经有7人回复
2楼2009-09-11 10:20:58
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
3楼2009-09-11 10:45:41
maad
木虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1649.2
- 散金: 769
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 245
- 在线: 470小时
- 虫号: 565636
- 注册: 2008-05-29
- 专业: 膜生物化学与膜生物物理学
4楼2009-09-11 10:52:34
50