| ²é¿´: 1995 | »Ø¸´: 15 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
Ê¢ÏĵĹûʵ91½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÎÄÕÂÖÐͼµÄ×ø±ê±ê´í£¬±»Éó¸åÈË·¢ÏÖÁË£¬Ôõô»Ø¸´Òâ¼û±È½ÏºÃÄØ£¿ ÒÑÓÐ2È˲ÎÓë
|
||
|
ÒòΪ×Ô¼ºµÄ´ÖÐÄ´óÒ⣬°ÑͼÖÐ×ø±êÖáµÄÊýֵŪ´íÁË£¬Ó¦¸ÃÊÇ0.6 0.5 0.4£¬µ«ÊÇ0.5д³É0.4ÁË¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤¡¤±»Éó¸åÈËÖ¸³öÀ´ÁË£¬»¹ËµÓвÙ×ÝÊý¾ÝµÄÏÓÒÉ¡£Ä¿Ç°¸øµÄÊÇ´óÐÞ£¬²»ÖªµÀÔõô»Ø´ðÕâ¸öÎÊÌâ±È½ÏºÃ¡£¿ÒÇë¸÷λ³æÓѰïæ¡£Íò·Ö¸Ðл£¡£¡£¡£¡ ¸½ÉÏÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£º ÏÈÊÇÌáÁËÒâ¼û£¬Õâ¸öÊǵÚ2Ìõ£ºFig 3a why there were two -0.4 V showing in the X-axis, Please confirm it as it looks like the figure has been manipulated and manipulation is very sensitive in the academic. Ò»¹²3ÌõÒâ¼û£¬È»ºóÔÚËùÓÐÒâ¼ûºóÓÖдÁËÕâ¾ä»°£º overall, the potential of the proposed Mn-CP NPs is well demonstrated but details in experiments were not well presented. Also, Fig 3a showed two identical -0.4 V in the X-axis, which is impossible to happen (it didn't happen in Fig 4a) if the figure is made by a software such as origin or sigmaplot. Please figure out what went wrong. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
0856»¯¹¤ÔÀí
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
289Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤085600µ÷¼ÁÇóÀÏʦÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
£¨081700£©»¯Ñ§¹¤³ÌÓë¼¼Êõ-298·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøT0PÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öпƴó²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤¡£353·ÖÄܵ÷¼Áµ½ÄÄ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
337Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÄÏÀí¹¤0805²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
»ï°éÃÇ£¬×£ÎÒÉúÈÕ¿ìÀÖ°É
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
12Â¥2022-06-18 09:51:05
¿ÆÑÐ000000
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 21858.9
- É¢½ð: 25
- ºì»¨: 16
- Ìû×Ó: 3410
- ÔÚÏß: 584.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1092303
- ×¢²á: 2010-09-07
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÉúÎﻯ¹¤ÓëʳƷ»¯¹¤
2Â¥2022-06-16 21:14:58
3Â¥2022-06-16 21:57:23
nono2009
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
No gains, no pains.
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 28684 (Ժʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 513.911
- ½ð±Ò: 2555220
- É¢½ð: 27828
- ºì»¨: 2147
- ɳ·¢: 66666
- Ìû×Ó: 1602255
- ÔÚÏß: 65200.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 827383
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑмҳﱸίԱ»á
4Â¥2022-06-17 08:17:08













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
10