| ²é¿´: 2757 | »Ø¸´: 25 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
ljl1205ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
´ó¼Ò°ÑÊÕµ½µÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û¶¼·¢ÉÏÀ´°É
|
||
´ó¼Ò°ÑÊÕµ½µÄÉó¸åÒâ¼û¶¼·¢ÉÏÀ´°É£¬É¹É¹¿´¿´Éó¸åÈËµÄÆÀ¼Û£¬ÓÐûÓÐ×îºÃµÄÆÀÓÈð³µÈÕ°ÑöÒ»ÏÂ![]() ![]() |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
366Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì085601£¬270Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ37È˻ظ´
279ѧ˶ʳƷרҵÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
290µ÷¼ÁÉúÎï0860
ÒѾÓÐ31È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸085802 323·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
277Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
322Çóµ÷¼Á£¬08¹¤¿Æ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì281»¹Óе÷¼Á»ú»áÂð
ÒѾÓÐ30È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§070300 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶294·Ö£¬Çóµ¼Ê¦ÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
zdfbb
Ìú³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 33.5
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 1116
- ÔÚÏß: 87.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 513588
- ×¢²á: 2008-02-28
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »¯Ñ§·´Ó¦¹¤³Ì
|
Referee's comments: The topic of the manuscript is of considerable interest to the scientific community. The manuscript is well written (still however careful proof reading is needed), the data are well presented and discussion adequate and on a good level. The manuscript contains new and interesting results on the synthesis and photocatalytic behavior of ZnO/SnO2 composite photocatalyst. However, the paper still needs some minor revision. 1. The manuscript sometimes is being unnecessarily wordy. 2. I am not sure if the quality of figures is good enough. 3. Figure 2 and its label has to be separated, they overlap in my version of the manuscript. Yours sincerely Editorial Office Turkish Journal of Chemistry |
25Â¥2009-09-17 09:54:17
ljl1205
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 12 (СѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.118
- ½ð±Ò: 3602.5
- É¢½ð: 2948
- ºì»¨: 22
- Ìû×Ó: 1305
- ÔÚÏß: 1822.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 353140
- ×¢²á: 2007-04-23
- רҵ: ¿ØÖÆÀíÂÛÓë·½·¨
2Â¥2009-09-09 21:47:42
goodtimega
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 8138.7
- É¢½ð: 570
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 1489
- ÔÚÏß: 527.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 820248
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-02
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ó²ÄÁϽṹÓëÐÔÄÜ
3Â¥2009-09-09 21:58:28
bjlumang
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 25 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 9225.9
- É¢½ð: 56
- ºì»¨: 14
- Ìû×Ó: 7788
- ÔÚÏß: 640.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 149938
- ×¢²á: 2005-12-29
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: »¯¹¤ÈÈÁ¦Ñ§ºÍ»ù´¡Êý¾Ý
|
COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS Reviewer #1: It is a well written paper with a clear objective and well designed experiments. The findings are a relevant contribution in the field of engineered bioremediation. However, a few minor issues should be addressed: Reviewer #2: This is a good work to combine the bioslurry and two-liquid-phase systems in order to biological degrade persistant contaminants. It contains a variety of chemical and biochemical analysis in order to evaluate the performance of system. However, as I read the manuscript, I theink it need a minor revision about following comments: |
4Â¥2009-09-09 22:18:43














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
5