24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2584  |  回复: 25
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ljl1205

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 大家把收到的审稿意见都发上来吧

大家把收到的审稿意见都发上来吧,晒晒看看审稿人的评价,有没有最好的评语,让俺等瞻仰一下
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wuss2005

木虫 (著名写手)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
ljl1205(金币+5,VIP+0): 9-12 14:54
ljl1205(金币+5,VIP+0): 9-13 11:50
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
>
> Reviewer: 1
>
> Recommendation: This paper is publishable subject to minor revisions noted.  Further review is not needed.
>
> Comments:
> Wu and co-workers report amino-acid-assisted hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalysis of SnO2 nanocrystals. This is an interesting research work. The as-synthesized SnO2 nanocrystals are monodisperse nanocrystrtals with particle size below 10 nm, as well as excellent photocatalytic activity of RhB dye with the degradation of RhB close 100% within 150 min.  However, the presented TEM images (Figure 3) is too small to show the size and dispersity of the particles. After providing more clear images, the manuscript can be accepted for publication.
>
>
> Reviewer: 2
>
> Recommendation: This paper is probably publishable, but should be reviewed again in revised form before it is accepted.
>
> Comments:
>    This communication described the hydrothermal synthesis of SnO2 nanoparticles with small diameter and their photocatalytic degradation properties. This manuscript can be considered for publication on JPCC after the following comments modified.
>
> 1. In the manuscript, only the sample s-3 was applied in the photocatalytic degradation study. The authors should add more experiments on the other samples prepared in the report. Then the influence of the particle size of the the samples should be presented.
>
> 2. And based on the photocatalytic degradation experiments for all the sample, selecting the best one sample for further characterization, such as UV-Vis absorption study and HRTEM study.
>
> 3. Some writting errors should be corrected:
>     Page 4, Line 44, D should be wavelength,
>     Something was lost in equation 2,
>     equation 2 and 3 should be in same style.
>
>
> Reviewer: 3
>
> Recommendation: This paper is probably publishable, but should be reviewed again in revised form before it is accepted.
>
> Comments:
> Wu and co-workers report on the synthesis of SnO2 nanoparticles and their catalytic activity. This work seems of potential interest, however a few minor issues need to be resolved first.
>
> 1. Some work needs to be done to polish the english, but this is purely superficial at this stage. There are some major grammatical errors in the abstract.
>
> 2. XRD is used to analyse the crystal structure. The authors say they used the Scherrer equation to determine crystal size, but did not mention about what the sizes were? I couldnt find the analysis or results in the main text. More work is needed on interpreting the XRD data. Lots of effort has been put in to make the large number of samples and collect this data, it would be a shame not to get more out of it. There may be some information in the supporting material, but some mention of the diameter of the nanoparticles from XRD should be in the main text.
>
> 3. The TEM is difficult to see. The micrographs are low mag and contain a lot of superfluous material. Some higher magnification images should be taken to show individual crystal sizes and lattice structure. The micrographs are too small, they need to be larger. Too many are crammed into one figure. I cannot see any difference between the samples at this low mag.
>
> 4. The authors say that for the catalytic degradation the blanks experiments show that degradation of RhB is negligible without UV irradiation or the SnO2 nanoparticles. However, it is well known that RhB degrades under intense UV light. I would like to see the authors incorporate another plot in figure 5 that actually shows real data of the degradation of RhB in the absence of the SNO2 nanoparticles at the pH ranges used. It is important to clarify the effect of SnO2 particles on the degradation by using a suitable background measurement.
>
> This work has potential, but a few minor issues need tightening up before publication. Once these have been addressed this manuscript would be suitable for publication.
12楼2009-09-11 10:33:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 26 个回答

ljl1205

木虫 (著名写手)

80个金币,打造牛人的审稿意见汇合
2楼2009-09-09 21:47:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

goodtimega

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

This manuscript has two major parts. The one is correct is not innovative, and the one is innovative is not correct. Therefore, I would suggest the authors retake quantum chemistry courses and then consider submitting to this type of prestigious journal.
3楼2009-09-09 21:58:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bjlumang

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS

Reviewer #1: It is a well written paper with a clear objective and well designed experiments. The findings are a relevant contribution in the field of engineered bioremediation.
However, a few minor  issues should be addressed:

Reviewer #2: This is a good work to combine the bioslurry and two-liquid-phase systems in order to biological degrade persistant contaminants. It contains a variety of chemical and biochemical analysis in order to evaluate the performance of system. However, as I read the manuscript, I theink it need a minor revision about following comments:
4楼2009-09-09 22:18:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见