24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2584  |  回复: 25
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

ljl1205

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 大家把收到的审稿意见都发上来吧

大家把收到的审稿意见都发上来吧,晒晒看看审稿人的评价,有没有最好的评语,让俺等瞻仰一下
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wuss2005

木虫 (著名写手)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
ljl1205(金币+5,VIP+0): 9-12 14:55
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
> Reviewer: 1
> Recommendation: Accept after minor revisions.
> Comments:
> The authors present here biomineralization of BaCO3 complex nanostructures. It is indeed a research focus of nanotechnology. They provide enough data to study the growth mechanism. Especially, they report the superhydrophobicity of BaCO3. I believe this nanomaterial will find application in the future. Therefore, the work can be accepted for publication after following two questions are clarified.
> (1) The authors claimed that the as-prepared BaCO3 crystals were well oriented and grew mainly along the (111) face based on the corresponding XRD pattern. This conclusion should be confirmed again with HRTEM.
> (2) In Page 6, the authors mentioned the existence of hydrogen bonds in the complex BaCO3 nanostructures. What are the components or functional groups forming the hydrogen bonds?
>
>
>
> Reviewer: 2
> Recommendation: Accept after minor revisions.
> Comments:
> This paper is a well-written paper containing interesting results for the biomineralization and superhydrophobicity of BaCO3 complex nanostructures.  The synthesis, characterization, physicochemical measurement and formation mechanism of BaCO3 complex nanostructures are appropriately described.  This manuscript is suitable for publication in Inorganic Chemistry  However, a few minor revisions are listed below.
> 1) page 3, line 14 and so on:  BaCO3 ?
> 2) page 3, lines 15-16:  The reference [1] in text should describe in "references" term.
> 3) page 6, line s 18-22:  [KJ] ?
> 4) caption of Figure 2: HRTEMTEM ?
> Please correct for wrong compound name, unit, abbreviation and so on.
>
11楼2009-09-11 10:32:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 26 个回答

ljl1205

木虫 (著名写手)

80个金币,打造牛人的审稿意见汇合
2楼2009-09-09 21:47:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

goodtimega

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

This manuscript has two major parts. The one is correct is not innovative, and the one is innovative is not correct. Therefore, I would suggest the authors retake quantum chemistry courses and then consider submitting to this type of prestigious journal.
3楼2009-09-09 21:58:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bjlumang

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

COMMENTS FROM EDITORS AND REVIEWERS

Reviewer #1: It is a well written paper with a clear objective and well designed experiments. The findings are a relevant contribution in the field of engineered bioremediation.
However, a few minor  issues should be addressed:

Reviewer #2: This is a good work to combine the bioslurry and two-liquid-phase systems in order to biological degrade persistant contaminants. It contains a variety of chemical and biochemical analysis in order to evaluate the performance of system. However, as I read the manuscript, I theink it need a minor revision about following comments:
4楼2009-09-09 22:18:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见