| 查看: 362 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 广阔草原 的 15 个金币 | |||
广阔草原新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
投稿经验少，编辑是怎么考虑的呢？我又改怎么做？
|
||
|
While we are not opposed to further submissions on the topic we would be happier if new submissions took into account at least some of the work that has appeared in the journal over the last few years. I think it is fair to say that we would also expect a new paper on this topic to be making substantial progress before we were keen to publish it. Your paper may well satisfy the second of these conditions, but not the first. While I am rejecting the paper at this point we would consider a substantially revised paper that met our first condition. This of course is up to you, though it does strike me that the current purpose of your paper might be somewhat drowned out if you decided to take on this larger project. So we will entirely understand if you decide to go elsewhere. 我的论文是在批评最有影响力的模型的基础上提出的新模型，有文献支持。但我并没有太广泛的考虑到各种模型，因为好几个不同的领域对这个问题都有研究（包括这个期刊上也有几个文献，涉及到了哲学），都有些影响力不大的模型，广泛回顾的话费劲。 要是考虑到这个期刊的几个文献，那主题似乎要改变了，就不是锚定主流模型再提出新模型了，似乎不能只引用这一个期刊上的系列文献，而是要把各个领域的模型全都回顾一遍。 应该怎么做才好呢？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
287求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
085400 328分 求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
085601初试330分找调剂
已经有8人回复
-
266求调剂
已经有21人回复
-
08工学 309分求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
材料化工总分334求调剂
已经有15人回复
-
086003调剂求助
已经有18人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料类284调剂
已经有34人回复
-
调剂
已经有19人回复
