| 查看: 373 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 广阔草原 的 15 个金币 | |||
广阔草原新虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
投稿经验少，编辑是怎么考虑的呢？我又改怎么做？
|
||
|
While we are not opposed to further submissions on the topic we would be happier if new submissions took into account at least some of the work that has appeared in the journal over the last few years. I think it is fair to say that we would also expect a new paper on this topic to be making substantial progress before we were keen to publish it. Your paper may well satisfy the second of these conditions, but not the first. While I am rejecting the paper at this point we would consider a substantially revised paper that met our first condition. This of course is up to you, though it does strike me that the current purpose of your paper might be somewhat drowned out if you decided to take on this larger project. So we will entirely understand if you decide to go elsewhere. 我的论文是在批评最有影响力的模型的基础上提出的新模型，有文献支持。但我并没有太广泛的考虑到各种模型，因为好几个不同的领域对这个问题都有研究（包括这个期刊上也有几个文献，涉及到了哲学），都有些影响力不大的模型，广泛回顾的话费劲。 要是考虑到这个期刊的几个文献，那主题似乎要改变了，就不是锚定主流模型再提出新模型了，似乎不能只引用这一个期刊上的系列文献，而是要把各个领域的模型全都回顾一遍。 应该怎么做才好呢？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
生活琐事由它去
已经有4人回复
-
提交了我也来说说感想
已经有12人回复
-
青B发送上会通知了吗
已经有9人回复
-
西安交大新媒学院副院长用撤稿论文结题
已经有6人回复
-
论文撤稿了
已经有8人回复
-
博士申请
已经有7人回复
-
化学专业申博
已经有4人回复
-
河北省自然科学基金
已经有9人回复
-
某211大学教师把个人教师官方主页改成:我跑了我跑了我跑了!官宣跑路！
已经有5人回复
-
26/27申博自荐
已经有9人回复