24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 Kashmir_97 的 63 个金币，回帖就立即获得 3 个金币，每人有 1 次机会

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

Kashmir_97

铜虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1005.3
帖子: 303
在线: 13.6小时
虫号: 27647704

[交流] Earth’s Future一审意见返回，恳请前辈们帮小硕看看？

一共两个审稿人，审了五个月，两个审稿人都给了大修，编辑最重给了大修，20天修改时间。
这是两个审稿人的打分：
Reviewer #1 Evaluations:
Recommendation: Return to author for major revisions
Significant: The paper has some unclear or incomplete reasoning but will likely be a significant contribution with revision and clarification.
Supported: Mostly yes, but some further information and/or data are needed.
Referencing: Mostly yes, but some additions are necessary.
Quality: The organization of the manuscript and presentation of the data and results need some improvement.
Data: Yes
Accurate Key Points: No

Reviewer #2 Evaluations:
Recommendation: Return to author for major revisions
Significant: There are major errors or gaps in the paper but it could still become significant with major changes, revisions, and/or additional data.
Supported: Yes
Referencing: Yes
Quality: Yes, it is well-written, logically organized, and the figures and tables are appropriate.
Data: Yes
Accurate Key Points: Yes

主要意见大概是摘要引言需要重写，结论和讨论没有突出文章的主要贡献，然后图需要修改（字太小），另外就是一些语法错误。

发自小木虫Android客户端

回复此楼