| 查看: 252 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
eroszhyx木虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
【其他】FW: Top Asia-Pacific Institutions in Material Science
|
||
|
Top Asia-Pacific institutions in material science 27 August 2009 Data provided by Thomson Reuters from its Essential Science Indicators, 1 January 1999-30 April 2009 Rank World Rank Institution Papers Citations Citations per paper 1 19 Japan Science & Technology Agency 1,351 14,941 11.06 2 26 National University of Singapore 2,277 23,008 10.10 3 28 City University of Hong Kong 1,269 11,973 9.43 4 33 U of Science and Technology of China 1,598 13,016 8.15 5 34 Seoul National University 2,438 19,778 8.11 6 35 Nat Inst for Materials Science , Japan 3,722 27,607 7.42 7 36 Kyoto University 2,630 19,269 7.33 8 38 Nat Inst of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology , Japan 4,345 31,324 7.21 9 39 Korea Adv Inst of Science and Tech 2,062 14,636 7.10 10 40 Kyushu University 1,666 11,717 7.03 11 42 National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan 1,591 10,890 6.84 12 43 Tokyo Institute of Technology 2,685 18,217 6.78 13 44 Tohoku University 5,603 37,888 6.76 14 45 University of Tokyo 3,071 20,742 6.75 15 47 Osaka University 3,668 23,985 6.54 16 48 Nanyang Tech University, Singapore 2,416 15,339 6.35 17 49 Yonsei University, South Korea 1,638 10,127 6.18 18 50 Jilin University, China 1,754 10,613 6.05 19 51 Chinese Academy of Sciences 13,039 72,690 5.57 20 52 Tsing Hua University, China 4,352 23,496 5.40 21 53 Nat. Cheng Kung University, Taiwan 2,092 10,583 5.06 22 54 Zhejiang University, China 2,398 10,818 4.51 23 56 Shanghai Jiao Tong University 3,044 10,580 3.48 The data above were extracted from the Essential Science Indicators database of Thomson Reuters. This database, currently covering the period 1 January 1999 through 30 April 2009, surveys only journal articles (original research reports and review articles) indexed by Thomson Reuters. Articles are assigned to a category based on the journals in which they were published and the Thomson Reuters journal-to-category field definition scheme. Both articles tabulated and citation counts to those articles are for the period indicated. Naturally, institutions publishing large numbers of papers have a greater likelihood of collecting more citations than those publishing fewer papers. This ranking is by citations per paper (impact), among those Asia-Pacific institutions that have collected 10,000 or more citations in materials science during the period. For papers with multiple institutional addresses, each institution receives full, not fractional, citation credit. Essential Science Indicators lists institutions ranked in the top 1 per cent for a field over a given period, based on total citations. For the current version, 604 institutions are listed in the field of materials science, meaning that a total of 60,400 institutions were surveyed to obtain these results. Of the 604, 57 institutions collected 10,000 or more citations and of these, 23, or 40 per cent, were located in the Asia-Pacific region. The breakdown by nations is: nine for Japan , seven for China , three for South Korea , and two each for Singapore and for Taiwan . The ranking by citations per paper (impact) seeks to reveal “heavy hitters” based on per paper influence, not mere output. Also appearing is the world rank by impact for each of these Asia-Pacific institutions. For more information on the Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicators database, see http://scientific.thomsonreuters.com/products/esi. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有15人回复
-
filecode
已经有8人回复
-
确定了，国自然21号放榜
已经有7人回复
-
帮忙看看fileCode
已经有5人回复
-
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分？
已经有11人回复
-
关于代码变化问题，想知道的进来
已经有24人回复
-
为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果
已经有3人回复
-
静等基金结果
已经有16人回复
-
我的国基提前知道中了，可是同事的操作让我实在接受不了，怎么会有这样的人
已经有11人回复
-
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有3人回复
