| ²é¿´: 822 | »Ø¸´: 8 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| ¡¾Óн±½»Á÷¡¿»ý¼«»Ø¸´±¾Ìû×Ó£¬²ÎÓë½»Á÷£¬¾ÍÓлú»á·ÖµÃ×÷Õß dxp5380 µÄ 3 ¸ö½ð±Ò | |||
dxp5380½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿¼ÆËãʱ³öÏÖµÄÎÊÌâ
|
||
|
ÓÃABINIT ¼ÆËãʱ³öÏÖÒ»ÏÂÎÊÌ⣬Çë³æÓÑÃǰïæÕÒÒ»ÏÂÔÒò£¬¸ÃÈçºÎ½â¾ö¡£³õ´Î½Ó´¥ABINIT£¬Íû´ó¼Ò²»Áߴͽ̣¡Ð»Ð»£¡ -P-0000 kpgsph : BUG - -P-0000 The variables ikg, mkmem, and mpw must satisfy ikg<=(mkmem-1)*mpw, -P-0000 while the arguments of the routine are -P-0000 ikg = 291671, mkmem = 18, mpw = 16959 -P-0000 Probable cause: Known error in invars1 for parallel spin-polarized case. -P-0000 Temporary solution: Change the number of parallel processes. -P-0000 -P-0000 leave_new : decision taken to exit ... -P-0000 leave_new : synchronization done... -P-0000 leave_new : exiting... |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211£¬»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶£¬310·Ö£¬±¾¿ÆÖصãË«·Ç£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211£¬»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶£¬310·Ö£¬±¾¿ÆÖصãË«·Ç£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§Ñ§Ë¶311·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶306·ÖÕÒºÏÊʵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§¹¤³Ìµ÷¼Á289
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶ 285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ22È˻ظ´
298Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
368»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
326Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
casjxm
ͳæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 19 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 737.1
- É¢½ð: 20
- Ìû×Ó: 443
- ÔÚÏß: 356.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 445122
- ×¢²á: 2007-10-27
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔ II £ºµç×ӽṹ
¡ï ¡ï
dxp5380(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл 8-29 15:53
zxzj05(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):3Q! ¹ÄÀøÌÖÂÛ£¡ 10-13 13:52
dxp5380(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл 8-29 15:53
zxzj05(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):3Q! ¹ÄÀøÌÖÂÛ£¡ 10-13 13:52
| ¸öÈ˹۵㣺 ¿ÉÄÜÓëʹÓõĺËÊýÓйأ¬ÎÒÔøËãÁËÒ»¸ö¶«Î÷£¬³¬¹ý10¸öºË£¬Ëã×ÅËãמͻá³ö´í£¬ÉèÖÃСÓÚ10¸öºË¾ÍûÎÊÌâÁË¡£ |
2Â¥2009-08-29 14:52:13
![]() |
3Â¥2009-08-29 15:52:10
dxp5380
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 5577.7
- É¢½ð: 15
- Ìû×Ó: 2329
- ÔÚÏß: 81.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 632008
- ×¢²á: 2008-10-21
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔI:½á¹¹¡¢Á¦Ñ§ºÍ
¡ï ¡ï
fegg7502(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):¹ÄÀø½»Á÷2 8-30 17:06
fegg7502(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):¹ÄÀø½»Á÷2 8-30 17:06
|
ÎҸоõ²»ÊÇcpuÊýÁ¿µÄÔÒò¡£ÎÒÁ¬ÐøÓÅ»¯¹ý£¬ ndtset 3 getcell -1 getxred -1 ngkpt1 8 8 8 ngkpt2 10 10 10 ngkpt3 12 12 12 Ò»ÇÐÕý³£¡£µ«ÔÚÏÂÃæµÄ¼ÆËãÖгöÏÖÁËÎÊÌ⣺ ndtset 4 getcell -1 getxred -1 strtarget1 strtarget2 strtarget3 strtarget4 (ºóÃæ¾ßÌåµÄÊý¾Í²»ÁÐÁË£© Ö»ËãÁËÒ»²½£¬¾Í³öÏÖÁËÉÏÃæµÄÎÊÌâ¡£ÇëÎÊ£ºÔÚÕâÖÖÇé¿öϵÄÓÅ»¯²ÎÊýÈçºÎÉ裿Èçoptcell£¬ionmov£¬iscfµÈ¡£ÁíÍ⻹ÐèÒªÄÇЩ²ÎÊý£¿Ð»Ð»£¡ |
4Â¥2009-08-29 16:19:23
dxp5380
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 5577.7
- É¢½ð: 15
- Ìû×Ó: 2329
- ÔÚÏß: 81.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 632008
- ×¢²á: 2008-10-21
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔI:½á¹¹¡¢Á¦Ñ§ºÍ
5Â¥2009-09-16 20:00:46
zxzj05
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- 1STÇ¿Ìû: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.242
- ½ð±Ò: 5912.5
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 1528
- ÔÚÏß: 144.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 406147
- ×¢²á: 2007-06-18
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ½ðÊô¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏ
- ¹ÜϽ: µÚÒ»ÐÔÔÀí
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
freshgirl(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл²ÎÓë~ 9-16 22:09
dxp5380(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):лл 9-23 08:17
freshgirl(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл²ÎÓë~ 9-16 22:09
dxp5380(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):лл 9-23 08:17
|
The variables ikg, mkmem, and mpw must satisfy ikg<=(mkmem-1)*mpw, ¿ÏÄÜÊDzÎÊýÖ®¼äµÄÉèÖÃÓгåÍ» |

6Â¥2009-09-16 21:34:19
dxp5380
½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 5577.7
- É¢½ð: 15
- Ìû×Ó: 2329
- ÔÚÏß: 81.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 632008
- ×¢²á: 2008-10-21
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔI:½á¹¹¡¢Á¦Ñ§ºÍ
7Â¥2009-09-23 11:13:04
wenyun0876
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
ÀÏľ³æ
- Ó¦Öú: 6 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.01
- ½ð±Ò: 9096.4
- É¢½ð: 28
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 841
- ÔÚÏß: 344.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 494388
- ×¢²á: 2008-01-13
- רҵ: ÎÞ»ú·Ç½ðÊôÀà¹âµçÐÅÏ¢Ó빦
¡ï ¡ï
zxzj05(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):3Q! ¹ÄÀøÌÖÂÛ£¡ 10-13 13:53
dxp5380(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл£¡ 10-13 14:33
zxzj05(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):3Q! ¹ÄÀøÌÖÂÛ£¡ 10-13 13:53
dxp5380(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл£¡ 10-13 14:33
|
" Probable cause: Known error in invars1 for parallel spin-polarized case" ¿ÉÄÜÊDz¢Ðл¯ÔÒò°É |

8Â¥2009-10-13 10:51:44
netx_ray
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2358.1
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 146
- ÔÚÏß: 140Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 133380
- ×¢²á: 2005-12-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔI:½á¹¹¡¢Á¦Ñ§ºÍ
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
zxzj05(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):3Q! ¹ÄÀøÌÖÂÛ£¡ 10-13 13:53
dxp5380(½ð±Ò+3,VIP+0):²»Ì«Ã÷°×£¡Ð»Ð»Ä㣡 10-13 14:33
zxzj05(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):3Q! ¹ÄÀøÌÖÂÛ£¡ 10-13 13:53
dxp5380(½ð±Ò+3,VIP+0):²»Ì«Ã÷°×£¡Ð»Ð»Ä㣡 10-13 14:33
|
ABINITµÄmaillistÓÐÈËÌáµ½¹ýÕâ¸öÎÊÌ⣬ÊÇgetcell ºÍgetxred ÒýÆðµÄ Dear Colleagues, I have identified a bug in kpgsph.F90 (or else, a bug in how it's called) which arises when getcell 1 is used to initiate a calculation given the optimized cell from a previous run. The problem arises in the calculation of the number of planewaves npw. At about line 390 is the line npw=ig, where ig was calculated in the above loops. The variable npw is then used later in several places involving the array kg_small, which was dimensioned (3,mpw*np_band). The problem is that in the getcell 1 case, it occurs occasionally to have ig and hence npw exceed mpw, in which case the program crashes due to array out of bounds. In the nested loops where ig is computed, there are multiple places where the array limits are checked for (see line 273 for example: if (ig <= mpw*np_band) then...). However, the value of ig itself is not controlled in this way, so later when npw=ig is set, it can be that npw is too big for the array. I have implemented the following work-around (wouldn't call it a bug fix because it seems too dirty): npw=ig is replaced by if (mpw*np_band > 0 .and. ig > mpw*np_band) then npw=mpw else npw=ig endif this works but I'm not sure it's quite the proper thing to do. To be honest I don't really understand the calculation of ig leading up to this point so there might be unintended consequences of this assignment. Please note that this is not a failure to use dilatmx in the second calculation, the code requires you in the getcell = 1 case to use a big enough dilatmx to account for the changes to acell that occured in the optimization. So in other words I use dilatmx in both the optimization and subsequent calculations using getcell 1. I would appreciate comments and clarifications. |
9Â¥2009-10-13 11:02:44














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
