24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3167)
>虫友互识 (366)
>休闲灌水 (183)
>导师招生 (140)
>文献求助 (133)
>论文道贺祈福 (54)
>考博 (48)
>论文投稿 (47)
>博后之家 (40)
>考研 (34)
>硕博家园 (30)
>公派出国 (27)
>招聘信息布告栏 (24)
>基金申请 (23)
>找工作 (14)
>教师之家 (12)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

小勇奋战

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 28
帖子: 5
在线: 12分钟
虫号: 28247159
注册: 2022-01-29
专业: 通信理论与系统

[交流] 求助各位大佬们最终的审稿意见希望大不大已有7人参与

Manuscript ID XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX submitted to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, has been reviewed.  The comments from reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter.

In view of reviewer feedback, we must decline the manuscript for publication in the XXXXXXXXXX at this time.  However, a new manuscript may be submitted which takes into consideration these comments.

Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewer(s) before a decision is rendered.

You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript.  Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer.

Once you have revised your manuscript, go to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX and login to your Author Center.  Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number.  Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to the XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible but no later than a month from today.  If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within a reasonable amount of time, we will consider your paper as a new submission.

I look forward to a resubmission.

Sincerely,
Editor in Chief

AE Comments to Author:
Associate Editor
Comments to the Author:
Dear Authors,
Thank you for your submission. The paper has been written very well and supported by experimental results.

However, the reviewers believe that the manuscript is lacking in some key details that would vastly improve the papers readability and reach. We would like you to revise and resubmit the paper, paying attention to the detailed review comments by reviewers #2 and #3.

回复此楼