| ²é¿´: 1059 | »Ø¸´: 2 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õß421594199½«ÔùËÍÄú 15 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
421594199гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÈçºÎ×ö³öVBMµÄ¾ßÌåµçλֵ£¬´Ó¶ø¼ÆËã´øÆ«£¨Band offset£© ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
|
|
Õâ¸öͼÀïÃæÆ½¾ù¾²µçÊÆÎÒÊÇ»á¼ÆËãµÄ£¬µ«ÊǺÜÀ§ÈÅÎÒµÄÊÇÕâ¸öTiO2ÒÔ¼°MgOµÄVBMµçλֵÈçºÎ»ñµÃµÄ¡£ÎÄÏ×ÖÐÕâÑùÃèÊöµÄ To further characterize the interfacial electronic properties, we have explored the electrostatic potential of the MgO/ TiO2(001) heterostructure and the corresponding MgO and TiO2 individual components. We have computed the macro- scopic average potential using eq 2, and the corresponding ¦¤ ̿V (z)MgO/TiO2 is 3.981 eV, as shown in Figure 4. The band offsets were computed using eqs 1−4. The valence band offset ¦¤EVBO was found by eq 3, and the conduction band offset ¦¤ECBO was found by eq 4. These were computed as 0.03 and 0.91 eV, respectively, because the MgO/TiO2 heterostructure is a straddling-gap-type structure. This heterostructure will not fall under type II because these band alignments are not like those of staggered type II. Ö»ÊÇ˵¼ÆËãµÃµ½£¬ÎҾͺÜÃÔ»ó |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
299Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©Àí¹¤´óѧ±¾¿Æ211²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì294Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
300Çóµ÷¼Á£¬²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ó¢Ò»Êý¶þ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
ÕÐÊÕÉúÎïѧ/ϸ°ûÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
070305¸ß·Ö×Ó»¯Ñ§ÓëÎïÀí 304·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
289Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸¹þ¶û±õ¹¤Òµ´óѧ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤·½Ïò336·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
081200-11408-276ѧ˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
µ÷¼ÁÇóԺУÕÐÊÕ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
µ÷¼Á310
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
421594199
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 27.5
- Ìû×Ó: 9
- ÔÚÏß: 8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 28036287
- ×¢²á: 2021-12-29
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå²ÄÁÏ
2Â¥2022-01-12 23:35:23
·ëæÃ2013
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 488.2
- É¢½ð: 131
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 190
- ÔÚÏß: 111.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2361038
- ×¢²á: 2013-03-19
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå²ÄÁÏ
3Â¥2022-01-19 13:01:04














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
20