24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 18679  |  回复: 55

Feynmanhot

木虫之王 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
甜甜小布丁: 金币+15, ★★★很有帮助 2022-01-08 15:56:14
甜甜小布丁: 金币+25, ★★★★★最佳答案 2022-02-06 18:15:44
引用回帖:
10楼: Originally posted by 甜甜小布丁 at 2022-01-08 14:40:18
这个算大子刊很难说,nature子刊有了nature materials和nature chemistry,这个新的nature methods很难超越,顶多能和science advance和nature communicaiton水平差不多,并且,近3年没有影响因子。...

我没听错吧,Nature旗下对应研究方向的专刊的journal哪本IF低于NC和SA了?除了nature materials和nature chemistry,其他不算大子刊?其他方向的就不提了,就说环化材,你查查nature energy,Nature Catalysis,Nature Nanotechnology,Nature Sustainability,哪本配不上称为大子刊?
还有,nature methods算是新的吗?06年就出版了,目前的2 year Impact Factor - 28.547,5- year Impact Factor - 44.96,这不能算是大子刊吗?
More Is Different.
11楼2022-01-08 15:16:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

甜甜小布丁

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
11楼: Originally posted by Feynmanhot at 2022-01-08 15:16:14
我没听错吧,Nature旗下对应研究方向的专刊的journal哪本IF低于NC和SA了?除了nature materials和nature chemistry,其他不算大子刊?其他方向的就不提了,就说环化材,你查查nature energy,Nature Catalysis,Na ...

谢谢,您说的很有道理,nature protocol等这些不算大子刊吧
Believe your-self and be assiduous.
12楼2022-01-08 15:57:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Feynmanhot

木虫之王 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
12楼: Originally posted by 甜甜小布丁 at 2022-01-08 15:57:39
谢谢,您说的很有道理,nature protocol等这些不算大子刊吧...

你觉得这个nature protocol可以被划分在哪个具体学科?是不是我们现在在讨论的这一类?别钻牛角尖。我可以明确和你说,Nature Synthesis就是大子刊,并且IF不会低于20,甚至很大概率超过30,。我们可以小赌个100软妹币,3年后出IF看结果。另外说句难听的,你别介意。你可能高攀不起,能不能送审都难说。比起前面说Nature的那些,我觉得这句话更实际点。也可以理解,国内的这些老板,很多都喜欢从上往下一本本试,反正editor秒杀也就耽误个1,2周。一篇文章投个1年的大有人在,反正耽误的是学生又不是自己。

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

More Is Different.
13楼2022-01-08 16:16:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

甜甜小布丁

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
11楼: Originally posted by Feynmanhot at 2022-01-08 15:16:14
我没听错吧,Nature旗下对应研究方向的专刊的journal哪本IF低于NC和SA了?除了nature materials和nature chemistry,其他不算大子刊?其他方向的就不提了,就说环化材,你查查nature energy,Nature Catalysis,Na ...

上面您说的这些大子刊都是不收费的,这个nature synthesis是收费的,跟nature comm和science advance一样,圈钱,所以我觉得难达到大子刊的水平
Believe your-self and be assiduous.
14楼2022-01-08 16:24:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

甜甜小布丁

木虫 (著名写手)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
13楼: Originally posted by Feynmanhot at 2022-01-08 16:16:55
你觉得这个nature protocol可以被划分在哪个具体学科?是不是我们现在在讨论的这一类?别钻牛角尖。我可以明确和你说,Nature Synthesis就是大子刊,并且IF不会低于20,甚至很大概率超过30,。我们可以小赌个100软妹 ...

谢谢大佬这么详细的分析,指导。跟老板说先投science advance,不送审了,再投nature systhesis试试看
Believe your-self and be assiduous.
15楼2022-01-08 16:34:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Feynmanhot

木虫之王 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
14楼: Originally posted by 甜甜小布丁 at 2022-01-08 16:24:18
上面您说的这些大子刊都是不收费的,这个nature synthesis是收费的,跟nature comm和science advance一样,圈钱,所以我觉得难达到大子刊的水平...

As part of the ongoing changes in scientific publishing, which aim to increase the readership, reach and impact of published research, many journals are moving from a traditional, subscription-based publishing model to an Open Access (OA) model. Under the OA model, an article is made freely available online when published, rather than being behind a paywall. Payment for publication is made by the authors’ institutions or funding bodies, who pay an Article Processing Charge (APC) when the research is accepted.
Authors submitting primary research articles to Nature Synthesis can choose to publish their work using either the traditional publishing route OR Open Access.
Nature Synthesis is actively committed to becoming a fully Open Access journal. We will increase the number of articles we publish OA, with the eventual goal of becoming a fully Open Access journal.
你细品品这段话,再去看看另外几个大子刊甚至nature的主页是不是也有这段话。你再看看nature近2年新开的大子刊是不是都变成OA了,之前的杂志是不是在逐步转变成OA,这是一种必然趋势。变OA收费的原因是,现在欧美大部分科研大国都在抵制杂志订阅收费,支持经费发表OA杂志,而不是经费用来订阅杂志,也不是说OA的杂志就不如免费的杂志。
More Is Different.
16楼2022-01-08 16:36:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Feynmanhot

木虫之王 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
15楼: Originally posted by 甜甜小布丁 at 2022-01-08 16:34:47
谢谢大佬这么详细的分析,指导。跟老板说先投science advance,不送审了,再投nature systhesis试试看...

看来你老板认为的是,nature systhesis还不如SA。不过无所谓,SA在我看来门槛也不低,祝好

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

More Is Different.
17楼2022-01-08 16:39:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

甜甜小布丁

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
16楼: Originally posted by Feynmanhot at 2022-01-08 16:36:36
As part of the ongoing changes in scientific publishing, which aim to increase the readership, reach and impact of published research, many journals are moving from a traditional, subscription-based ...

原来这样啊,谢谢您的悉心解释,我这小白不咋懂,谢谢您呀~终于懂了
Believe your-self and be assiduous.
18楼2022-01-08 16:45:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

甜甜小布丁

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
17楼: Originally posted by Feynmanhot at 2022-01-08 16:39:04
看来你老板认为的是,nature systhesis还不如SA。不过无所谓,SA在我看来门槛也不低,祝好...

老板问我投nature synthesis还是science advance?看老板提出的顺序,应该是更想投nature synthesis
Believe your-self and be assiduous.
19楼2022-01-08 16:46:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

甜甜小布丁

木虫 (著名写手)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
17楼: Originally posted by Feynmanhot at 2022-01-08 16:39:04
看来你老板认为的是,nature systhesis还不如SA。不过无所谓,SA在我看来门槛也不低,祝好...

谢谢
Believe your-self and be assiduous.
20楼2022-01-08 16:47:18
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 甜甜小布丁 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见