| ²é¿´: 886 | »Ø¸´: 9 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
Îä´óľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾Ô´´¡¿JPCBÉÏԺʿ·ßÅÁË
|
||
|
On Unjustifiably Misrepresenting the EVB Approach While Simultaneously Adopt ing It J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009, 113 (31), pp 10905¨C10915 http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1021/jp901709f |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
0703±¾¿ÆÖ£ÖÝ´óѧÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
311Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÀí£¬ÊýÒ»Ó¢Ò»285ÇóAÇøµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
µ÷¼Á310
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
321Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
349Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
±¾¿ÆÐÂÄÜÔ´¿ÆÑ§Ó빤³Ì£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÀíÄܶ¯285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
299Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
kovacs
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
¡«¡«¡ª¡ª¡Á¡Á
- Ó¦Öú: 28 (СѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.56
- ½ð±Ò: 19686.5
- É¢½ð: 1628
- ºì»¨: 10
- ɳ·¢: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 4094
- ÔÚÏß: 294.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 542201
- ×¢²á: 2008-04-09
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ó²ÄÁϽṹÓëÐÔÄÜ
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
ÕæÀíÃæÇ°ÎÞȨÍþ£¬Ñ§ÊõÁìÓò²ÅÓÐËùνµÄ¡°È¨Íþ¡±¡£ ÕæÀíÃæÇ°£¬ÔºÊ¿Ò²²»Ò»¶¨work |

5Â¥2009-08-26 15:56:27
xgyanger
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 17 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1731.8
- É¢½ð: 1801
- ºì»¨: 13
- Ìû×Ó: 1093
- ÔÚÏß: 385.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 591071
- ×¢²á: 2008-09-01
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
ABSTRACT: In recent years, the EVB has become a widely used tool in the QM/MM modeling of reactions in condensed phases and in biological systems, with ever increasing popularity. However, despite the fact that its power and validity have been repeatedly established since 1980, a recent work (Valero, R.; et al. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 1) has strongly criticized this approach, while not discussing the fact that one of the authors is effectively using it himself for both gas-phase and solution studies. Here, we have responded to the most serious unjustified assertions of that paper, covering both the more problematic aspects of that work and the more complex scientific aspects. Additionally, we have demonstrated that the poor EVB results shown in Valero et al. which where presented as verification of the unreliability of the EVB model were in fact obtained by the use of incorrect parameters, without comparing to the correct surface obtained by our program. һƪpaperÒý·¢µÄѪ°¸£¿ |
4Â¥2009-08-26 15:30:36
luyaozju
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 4 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1376.9
- É¢½ð: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 276
- ÔÚÏß: 55Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 646501
- ×¢²á: 2008-11-05
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¦ÄÜÓëÖÇÄܸ߷Ö×Ó
7Â¥2009-08-26 16:43:48
Òª¿ìÀÖµÄÖí
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
¿ìÀÖ¼Ò×å-¿ìÀÖÖí
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.787
- ½ð±Ò: 716
- É¢½ð: 20
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 807
- ÔÚÏß: 18.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 831840
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-21
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ó²ÄÁÏ

8Â¥2009-08-26 17:17:49














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥