[交流] 不明白审稿人的意见，求助，在线等 已有1人参与

小弟做了一个普通的香肠，和一个用蘑菇替代肥肉和部分瘦肉的香肠（命名为novel sausage，利用响应面法做出的最好的蘑菇替代的香肠），然后把两者进行了对比。投稿后审稿人有条意见是这样的，     If you take out all the fat and part of meat and replace it with mushrooms only to conclude that "novel sausage" has lower levels of fat, energy, and saturated fatty acid, but higher content of aspartic, glutamic, cysteine, methionine, proline, polyunsaturated fatty acid, and monounsaturated fatty acid then we must ask the authors what was the null hypothesis? Were they excepting a different conclusion? If not why prove the obvious? Yes, mushrooms have less fat, energy and saturated fatty acids then pork meat and fat and if you replace meat and fat from sausage with them was there a theoretical chance od discovering anything else but what's obvious?     请问下划线的地方该怎么理解呢？该怎么回复这位审稿人呢？大哥大嫂救救孩子     担心金币不够不能回帖，签到领取金币后必送上小红花。

回复此楼