| ²é¿´: 209 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
csulblÌú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÇóÖú·ÒëÒ»¶ÎÆÀÉóÒâ¼û
|
||
| The "Degree of graphitization" is an antique concept that it not only wrong but ambiguous. Surely you can see that it is simply another way of giving the average interlayer spacing? You mention Lc but it is impossible to obtain a value from only one peak. What you have measured are the peak position (interlayer spacing) and the peak width. It is sufficient to give only these values. A wider peak is usually associated with a smaller Lc, but not always. Do not derive useless numbers from your measurements. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
282Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
±¾¿Æ211ÉúÎïҽѧ¹¤³Ì085409Çóµ÷¼Á339·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
284Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
385·Ö ÉúÎïѧ£¨071000£©Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏר˶ µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
306·Ö²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸211ÉúÎïѧ280·Ö Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
086000ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©298µ÷¼ÁÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
csulbl
Ìú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 8.8
- Ìû×Ó: 55
- ÔÚÏß: 57Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 618471
- ×¢²á: 2008-10-06
3Â¥2009-08-26 10:56:03
nono2009
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
No gains, no pains.
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +21105 - ·ÒëEPI: 3
- Ó¦Öú: 28684 (Ժʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 513.911
- ½ð±Ò: 2555230
- É¢½ð: 27828
- ºì»¨: 2148
- ɳ·¢: 66666
- Ìû×Ó: 1602255
- ÔÚÏß: 65200.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 827383
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑмҳﱸίԱ»á
2Â¥2009-08-26 10:39:00














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥