| ²é¿´: 354 | »Ø¸´: 2 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
csulblÌú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
¡¾ÇóÖúÍê±Ï¡¿ÇóÖú·ÒëÒ»¶ÎÆÀÉóÒâ¼û
|
||
|
The "Degree of graphitization" is an antique concept that it not only wrong but ambiguous. Surely you can see that it is simply another way of giving the average interlayer spacing? You mention Lc but it is impossible to obtain a value from only one peak. What you have measured are the peak position (interlayer spacing) and the peak width. It is sufficient to give only these values. A wider peak is usually associated with a smaller Lc, but not always. Do not derive useless numbers from your measurements. [ Last edited by qingshaojun0823 on 2009-11-8 at 20:17 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
»¯¹¤µ÷¼Á303·Ö£¬¹ýËļ¶
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
071000ÉúÎïѧµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Àí¹¤´óѧ£¬080500ѧ˶£¬317·Ö£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
327Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
0856³õÊÔ324·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
08¿ªÍ·¿´¹ýÀ´£¡£¡£¡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©¿Æ¼¼´óѧ085601²ÄÁϹ¤³ÌÓ¢Ò»Êý¶þ³õÊÔ×Ü·Ö335Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
085900ÍÁľˮÀû336·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
319Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
csulbl
Ìú³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 8.8
- Ìû×Ó: 55
- ÔÚÏß: 57Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 618471
- ×¢²á: 2008-10-06
3Â¥2009-08-26 14:40:45
feng-peng-cheng
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
ÉÙ˧
- Ó¦Öú: 38 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 955.5
- É¢½ð: 14
- ºì»¨: 12
- Ìû×Ó: 534
- ÔÚÏß: 76.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 578359
- ×¢²á: 2008-06-30
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Í¿ÁÏ
¡ï
linghanyuan(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷ 8-26 20:43
linghanyuan(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷ 8-26 20:43
| "Degree of graphitization"ÊÇÒ»¸öÀÏÌ׵IJ»Ã÷È·µÄ´íÎó¸ÅÄî¡£¿ÉÒÔÃ÷Á˵ظø³öƽ¾ù¼ä¾àÂ𣿲»¿ÉÄܵ¥´ÓÒ»¸ö·å¾ÍÄܵõ½LcµÄÖµ¡£·åλÖ㨲ã¼ä¾à£©ºÍ·å¿íÕâЩÊý¾Ý¾ÍÒѾ×㹻˵Ã÷ÎÊÌâÁË¡£Í¨³££¬·åÔ½¿í£¬Lc¾ÍԽС£¬µ«Õâ²¢²»×ÜÊdzÉÁ¢µÄ¡£²»ÒªÍÆÂÛ£¬³ý·ÇÊÇÀ´×ÔÄãµÄÕæÊµµÄʵÑéÊý¾Ý¡£ |
2Â¥2009-08-26 14:32:37














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥